Teams

Island Walk Thawley

2024 Sarasota Social 70 & Over Women Wednesday · 7.0 W Wednesday

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-03-06Lost 01
L#1 Female DoublesAlaine Troisi / Nancy Dickson vs Alice Levine / Barbara Boyle2-6, 4-6
2024-02-28vs Payne Park HallWon 10
W#2 Female DoublesMae Rose / Joyce Turner vs Taffy Anderson / Joan Hatch6-4, 6-4
2024-02-21Won 10
W#2 Female DoublesMae Rose / Nancy L Ross vs Sue Hackney / Lucy Sherman6-3, 6-1
2024-02-14vs Payne Park WilliamsonWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesMae Rose / Alaine Troisi vs Joanne Watkins / Ellen Lizzo6-0, 6-0
2024-02-07vs Payne Park HallLost 01
L#2 Female DoublesNancy Dickson / Nancy L Ross vs Sigi Moriece / Marianne Zentz2-6, 3-6
2024-01-31vs Meadows Purple YaYasWon 10
W#2 Female DoublesMae Rose / Joyce Turner vs Barbara Boyle / Terri Costa3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-01-17vs Courtside FeldmeierLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesNancy Dickson / Gretchen de Boer vs Sally Pym / Sue Hackney6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2024-01-10vs Payne Park WilliamsonWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesMae Rose / Alaine Troisi vs Helga Williamson / Peggy Hite4-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 W Wednesday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Jacki Kilian
published 3.5
3.17
Gretchen de Boer
published 3.5
3.08
Alaine Troisi
published 3.5
Jill Sneider
published
Mae Rose
usually #2 Female Doubles 60%, also #1 Female Doubles 40% · published
Nancy Dickson
usually #1 Female Doubles 67%, also #2 Female Doubles 33% · published
Trish Connolly
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mae Rose + Alaine Troisi161256% gamesnot enough data
Mae Rose + Jacki Kilian10460% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Dickson + Jacki Kilian4357% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Dickson + Mae Rose2443% gamesnot enough data
Gretchen de Boer + Jill Sneider1438% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Dickson + Alaine Troisi303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jacki Kilian
65W–57L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Gretchen de Boer
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Alaine Troisi
46W–42L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.08
Jill Sneider
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mae Rose
88W–62L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Nancy Dickson
55W–59L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Trish Connolly
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.