Teams

ST MARY 18MX9.0A

2025 MIXED 18&Over · 18&Over MX9.0

19 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 18&Over MX9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.10 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.48
Timothy Rogers
published
4.37
Scott Eversole
published
4.31
Noa Ramo-Larios
published
4.25
Kristin Ginn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.25
Jessica Kim
published
4.20
Artem Melnik
published 4.5
4.17
Barry Seeman
published 4.5
4.16
Bryan Rodrigues
published 4.5
4.07
Kimberly Prast
published
4.04
Katy Keim
published
4.02
Brooke Frederick
published 4.5
3.96
Zuhal Elhan
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.92
Angela Merola
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.90
Nancy Deschane
published
3.83
Kristen Foster
published
3.81
3.78
Mai Angsupanich
published
Erik Amundson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bryan Rodrigues + Jessica Kim4257% gamesnot enough data
Timothy Rogers + Kristen Foster123 matchesnot enough data
Timothy Rogers + Jessica Kim033 matchesnot enough data
Timothy Rogers + Nancy Deschane213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Timothy Rogers
22W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%56%43%
4.48
Scott Eversole
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
4.37
Noa Ramo-Larios
17W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
4.31
Kristin Ginn
5W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
4.25
Jessica Kim
32W–15L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
4.25
5
Alex Milosh Stephanovich
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.24
4.5
Artem Melnik
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
4.20
4.5
Barry Seeman
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
4.17
4.5
Bryan Rodrigues
24W–15L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
4.16
Kimberly Prast
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
4.07
Katy Keim
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
4.04
4.5
Brooke Frederick
12W–5L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
4.02
Zuhal Elhan
75W–39L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Angela Merola
46W–18L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
3.92
Nancy Deschane
20W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.90
Kristen Foster
20W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.83
Joanna Broda-Schunck
5W–16L career · no lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
3.81
Mai Angsupanich
8W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.78
Erik Amundson
7W–0L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.