Teams

Sa.Highsmith18S

2025 Capital Fall Singles 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.29 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-31vs Kr.Esham18SSplit 11
W#2 SinglesSally Highsmith vs Abigail Douek6-4, 6-3
L#3 SinglesKristen Patch vs Kristin Esham2-6, 3-6
2025-10-14vs Ki.Meeker18SWon 30
W#1 SinglesFerebee Plyler vs Kimberlie Meeker6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesClaire Capps vs Sarah Herring6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesAnna Goodmon vs Emily Boyer6-2, 6-4
2025-10-08vs Ki.Meeker18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesSally Highsmith vs Kimberlie Meeker6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesMeghan Paris vs Sarah Herring7-6, 6-2
2025-10-01vs Kr.Esham18SWon 20
W#2 SinglesSally Highsmith vs Meghan Richardson6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesClaire Capps vs Rebecca Anderson6-1, 6-1
2025-09-09vs Ki.Meeker18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesFerebee Plyler vs Elena Stimmel6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesAnna Goodmon vs Holly Gyovai3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-09-02vs Kr.Esham18SWon 21
W#1 SinglesFerebee Plyler vs Abigail Douek7-5, 6-1
W#2 SinglesMeghan Paris vs Rebecca Anderson6-2, 6-0
L#3 SinglesKristen Patch vs Amy Gadke0-6, 1-6
2025-08-19vs Ki.Meeker18SWon 30
W#1 SinglesMeghan Paris vs Kimberlie Meeker6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesSally Highsmith vs Holly Gyovai6-3, 6-0
W#3 SinglesAnna Goodmon vs Sarah Herring6-2, 7-5
2025-08-12vs Kr.Esham18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesFerebee Plyler vs Mary Zimardo2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 SinglesSally Highsmith vs Marlet Edwards6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Ferebee Plyler
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.41
Sally Highsmith
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.34
Claire Capps
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.08
Meghan Paris
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.02
April Taylor
published 3
2.98
Anna Goodmon
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.75
Kristen Patch
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ferebee Plyler + Claire Capps11368% games+12.4% vs expected
Kristen Patch + Sally Highsmith27567% games+6.7% vs expected
Kristen Patch + Anna Goodmon6355% games+2.9% vs expected
Sally Highsmith + Claire Capps4348% games−4.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ferebee Plyler
87W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%21%79%
3.61
3.5
Sally Highsmith
159W–46L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%74%25%
3.41
3.5
Claire Capps
47W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Meghan Paris
85W–62L career · 3 lines in 2025
27%72%<1%
3.08
3
April Taylor
16W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.02
3
Anna Goodmon
76W–41L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Kristen Patch
80W–63L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.75

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.