Teams

Bush (Forestmeadows)

2023 Leon TriLevel 18 & Over · 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.70 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-10-01vs Voorhees (Forestmeadows)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Murray / Jennifer Winegardner vs Karen de Cardenas / Gina Herring6-0, 4-6, 0-1
2023-09-14vs Voorhees (Forestmeadows)Won 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Britt / Mary Warner vs Jane Swingler / Rhonda Tullos7-6, 7-6
2023-09-07vs Voorhees (Forestmeadows)Won 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Britt / Anna Jones vs Gina Herring / Karen de Cardenas6-2, 6-0
2023-09-05vs Voorhees (Forestmeadows)Split 11
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Murray / Jennifer Winegardner vs Gina Herring / Melissa Powell6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJennifer Britt / Mary Warner vs Jane Swingler / Rhonda Tullos6-4, 6-2
2023-08-29vs Voorhees (Forestmeadows)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJennifer Winegardner / Vickie Morgan-Gates vs Gina Herring / Karen de Cardenas5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2023-08-24vs Voorhees (Forestmeadows)Won 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Franson / Jennifer Britt vs Rhonda Tullos / Askal Ali6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2023-08-22vs Voorhees (Forestmeadows)Split 11
W#1 DoublesJennifer Britt / Anna Jones vs Rhonda Tullos / Jane Swingler6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesVickie Morgan-Gates / Elizabeth Murray vs Gina Herring / Melissa Powell6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Elizabeth Murray
published
3.72
Jennifer Britt
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.60
Lisa Franson
published
3.52
Jennifer Winegardner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.47
Olivia McCaffery
published
3.38
Vickie Morgan-Gates
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.33
Nancy Donahue
published
3.33
Anna Jones
published 4
3.29
Becky Bush
published 3.5
3.22
Rosina Cherry
published
3.13
Deborah Beers
published 3.5
Sally Davis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Winegardner + Becky Bush6253% games+4.7% vs expected
Vickie Morgan-Gates + Jennifer Winegardner4849% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Franson + Elizabeth Murray033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Murray
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
Jennifer Britt
111W–44L career · 5 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
Lisa Franson
18W–17L career · no lines in 2023
24%75%<1%
3.60
3.5
Jennifer Winegardner
195W–211L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%45%55%
3.52
Olivia McCaffery
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
3.47
4
Vickie Morgan-Gates
35W–70L career · type A · 2 lines in 2023
80%20%<1%
3.38
Nancy Donahue
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
4
Anna Jones
8W–1L career · no lines in 2023
89%11%<1%
3.33
3.5
Becky Bush
17W–10L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
Rosina Cherry
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Deborah Beers
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.13
Sally Davis
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.