Teams

Messier Coco Day

2026 South East Tennis Combo League 55 & over · Women 7.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-28vs McKenna/Doerr DAYWon 30
W#1 DoublesMargaret Coco / Maria Weese vs Joyce Jordan / Paula Bachman2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKathleen Bradcovich / Diane Thorne vs Elizabeth Gonzalez / Luanne Basile6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesMargaret Varga-Roberson / Katie Monroe vs Georgina Dillon / Cindy Antonelli6-1, 6-2
2026-08-26vs Adams 7.5 55Lost 12
L#1 DoublesDebra Carbone / Margaret Varga-Roberson vs Anne Milkes / Angelia Gallimore2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMargaret Coco / Diana Messier vs Lori Brinkley / Ann Carmichael Prior6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKathleen Hawkins / Phyllis Sheets vs Linda McKinney / Nancy Wilcox7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2026-08-19vs MacCall/Murphy DayWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Hartnett / Clarke Weidlein vs Tara MacCall / Suzy Horvath6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMargaret Varga-Roberson / Kathleen Hawkins vs Waleska Altreuter / Kathleen Murphy3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMargaret Coco / Diana Messier vs Jennifer Gick / Mia Delmontagne6-2, 7-5
2026-08-14vs Williamson/WilsonLost 03
L#1 DoublesJean Robbins / Debra Carbone vs Karen Fania / Helen Cressy0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMargaret Coco / Phyllis Sheets vs Lori Keipper / Rachael Bondy3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKathleen Hawkins / Katie Monroe vs Judi Leseur / Susan Wilson4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Jennifer Hartnett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Kathleen Bradcovich
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Margaret Coco
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.50
Holly Robinson
published
3.39
Phyllis Sheets
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.39
Margaret Varga-Roberson
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.35
Diana Messier
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.34
Clarke Weidlein
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Katie Monroe
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.31
Kathleen Hawkins
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.26
Debra Carbone
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Diane Thorne
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Maria Weese
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jean Robbins
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathleen Hawkins + Diane Thorne1742% games−16.9% vs expected
Margaret Coco + Diana Messier314 matchesnot enough data
Margaret Coco + Kathleen Bradcovich224 matchesnot enough data
Birgitta Jonsson-Seal + Kathleen Bradcovich134 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen Hawkins + Katie Monroe033 matchesnot enough data
Margaret Coco + Holly Robinson213 matchesnot enough data
Margaret Coco + Margaret Varga-Roberson213 matchesnot enough data
Diana Messier + Phyllis Sheets303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Hartnett
18W–29L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Birgitta Jonsson-Seal
4W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kathleen Bradcovich
15W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
Margaret Coco
14W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
20%79%<1%
3.62
Holly Robinson
5W–9L career · no lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
3.50
Phyllis Sheets
12W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.39
Margaret Varga-Roberson
8W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
79%21%<1%
3.39
3.5
Diana Messier
9W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Clarke Weidlein
11W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
Katie Monroe
12W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Kathleen Hawkins
8W–27L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
3.31
3.5
Debra Carbone
14W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Diane Thorne
3W–7L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Maria Weese
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
8%90%1%
3.19
Jean Robbins
72W–57L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.