Teams

Elings-Les Racquettes

2025 SCTA Doubles League - Santa Barbara · SB - Women Doubles - 3.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-12-14vs Muni-WLPL&TLost 01
L#1 DoublesAriel Long / Felisa Manion vs Tracy Selbie / Walden Bohnet3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-11-02vs SBTC-Honey Deuce'sWon 10
W#1 DoublesFelisa Manion / Inna Taranchenko vs Lisa MacHado / Linda Stirling6-1, 6-3
2025-10-26vs SB LLWx-Pickled TinisLost 02
L#1 DoublesAriel Long / Inna Taranchenko vs Emma Bridges / Galen Wilson1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLori Akers / Andi Trued vs Anne Mitchell / Karen Guardino4-6, 3-6
2025-10-19vs SB LL2-Volley Llamas-Colleen RickmanSplit 11
W#1 DoublesInna Taranchenko / Felisa Manion vs Annie Dzierski / Christina Burghard6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesLauren Katz / Rosanne Marquis vs Michelle Larrabee / Nancy Marden6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-10-12vs Muni-WLPL&TSplit 11
W#1 DoublesFelisa Manion / Ariel Long vs Jaime Dejong / KC Collins7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSavannah Bosley / Andi Trued vs Walden Bohnet / Tracy Selbie4-6, 4-6
2025-09-21vs SB LLWx-Pickled TinisSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAriel Long / Inna Taranchenko vs Kendall Pata / Jackie Gregoire6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLilia Hine / Rosanne Marquis vs Anne Mitchell / Linda Ullman6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesInna Taranchenko / Emma Mollenhauer vs Jamye Hanrahan / Kennedy Cross4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnna Fraser / Andi Trued vs Jennifer Slayman / Cindy Metzinger3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesRosanne Marquis / Lauren Katz vs Lori Travis / Stephanie June6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SB - Women Doubles - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Ariel Long
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.44
Andi Trued
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.42
Felisa Manion
published 3.5
3.34
Emma Mollenhauer
published 3.5
3.32
Amy Frazier
published 3.5
3.30
Inna Taranchenko
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
Christa Melton
published 3.5
3.22
Lori Akers
published
3.18
Anna Fraser
published 3.5
3.06
Rosanne Marquis
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
Savannah Bosley
published
3.00
Kirsten Lang
published
2.67
Lilia Hine
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Katie Taylor
published
Lauren Shin
published
Penny Wolfe
published
Veronica Buck-Tomm
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Inna Taranchenko + Ariel Long7159% games+8.0% vs expected
Penny Wolfe + Lori Akers0639% gamesnot enough data
Inna Taranchenko + Rosanne Marquis1439% gamesnot enough data
Inna Taranchenko + Felisa Manion314 matchesnot enough data
Rosanne Marquis + Amy Frazier134 matchesnot enough data
Ariel Long + Felisa Manion303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ariel Long
44W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.57
3.5
Andi Trued
43W–55L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%67%32%
3.44
3.5
Felisa Manion
30W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Emma Mollenhauer
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Amy Frazier
10W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Inna Taranchenko
104W–67L career · 9 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.30
3.5
Christa Melton
2W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lori Akers
13W–21L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Anna Fraser
8W–13L career · no lines in 2025
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Rosanne Marquis
66W–109L career · 3 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
Savannah Bosley
12W–20L career · no lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.04
Kirsten Lang
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
3.00
Lilia Hine
9W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.67
Katie Taylor
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lauren Shin
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Penny Wolfe
6W–22L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Veronica Buck-Tomm
2W–13L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.