Teams

MAC Pettit

2024 Richmond Combo Weekend · Richmond Combo Weekend 7.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.17 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-08-25Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChuck Snow / Jason Yost vs Andy Tucker / Thomas Young3-6, 3-6
2024-08-17vs Westwood- Mullahy ThunderstruckLost 01
L#2 DoublesErich Yost / Zach Pettit vs James Mullahy / Dutch Jones3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-08-11vs Avalon GhitaWon 10
W#1 DoublesJohn Bennett / Jason Yost vs Andrew Armstrong / Ayush Gandhi6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2024-08-03vs CCV Murphy/ParkerLost 01
L#1 DoublesJohn Bennett / Jason Yost vs Hunter Gallalee / Wit Robertson5-7, 1-6
2024-07-27vs Wyndham - HouffWon 20
W#2 DoublesJason Yost / John Bennett vs Lee Brooks / William Bryan7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesZach Pettit / Erich Yost vs Brad Houff / Bert Foreman6-2, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Weekend 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.23
Chuck Snow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.96
Matthew Boys
published
3.86
John Bennett
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.57
Jeff Kane
published
3.40
Erich Yost
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.37
Tucker Cole
published
3.10
Jay Pettit
published
3.08
Jason Yost
published
2.81
Kim Boys
published
Tom Rider
published
Zach Pettit
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chuck Snow + John Bennett465750% games+5.0% vs expected
Jason Yost + Erich Yost404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Chuck Snow
172W–207L career · 1 line in 2024
4%94%2%
4.23
Matthew Boys
24W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.96
4.5
John Bennett
180W–157L career · 3 lines in 2024
85%15%<1%
3.86
Jeff Kane
9W–11L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
Erich Yost
142W–68L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.40
Tucker Cole
8W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.37
Jay Pettit
11W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%22%78%
3.10
Jason Yost
15W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%27%73%
3.08
Kim Boys
2W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%8%
2.81
Tom Rider
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Zach Pettit
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.