Teams

Refunds

2022 Adult 40 & Over League · Refunds

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Refunds have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.28
Josh Goldblatt
published 4.5
3.72
Duncan Barger
published 4
3.49
Mary Parker
published
3.37
Wendy Lutgring
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.34
Toni Escuder
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Julie Linder
published
3.09
Cassandra Greco
published 3
2.90
Valerie Gulling
published
2.41
Ellen McKane
published 2.5
Laurie Beaty
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Josh Goldblatt
150W–75L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
4.28
4
Duncan Barger
22W–16L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.72
Mary Parker
8W–19L career · no lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
3.49
3.5
Wendy Lutgring
126W–118L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Toni Escuder
66W–63L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.34
Julie Linder
20W–11L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
3
Cassandra Greco
66W–52L career · no lines in 2022
<1%24%76%
3.09
Valerie Gulling
4W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
2.90
2.5
Ellen McKane
4W–10L career · no lines in 2022
0%76%24%
2.41
Laurie Beaty
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.