Teams

Jordan

2023 Norfolk Adult 40 & Over · Norfolk Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.75 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-20vs DomanskiWon 30
W#1 DoublesJoan Corkery / Veronica Cummings vs Christine Cowen / Betty Domanski6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJessica Hoffman-Schmitz / Shawen Bartol vs Jamie Friedberg / Donna Jones4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAdrienne Rylander / Cary Kelly vs Marcela Anongos / Ellen Gardner6-0, 6-0
2023-07-17vs DomanskiWon 21
W#1 DoublesShawen Bartol / Jessica Hoffman-Schmitz vs Janet Marx / Jamie Friedberg6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesVeronica Cummings / Joan Corkery vs Beth Kulas / Ellen Gardner6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesVirginia Kenyon / Adrienne Rylander vs Donna Jones / Betty Domanski2-6, 4-6
2023-07-13vs DomanskiWon 20
W#1 DoublesJessica Hoffman-Schmitz / Shawen Bartol vs Donna Jones / Christina Bartholomew6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCary Kelly / Joan Corkery vs Ellen Gardner / Christine Cowen6-1, 6-1
2023-07-11vs DomanskiLost 01
L#1 DoublesShawen Bartol / Cary Kelly vs Tammy Willett / Christina Bartholomew2-6, 2-6
2023-07-06vs DomanskiWon 20
W#1 DoublesVeronica Cummings / Shawen Bartol vs Janet Marx / Marcela Anongos6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAdrienne Rylander / Dawn Curran vs Tammy Willett / Betty Domanski7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2023-06-29vs DomanskiWon 20
W#2 DoublesShawen Bartol / Jessica Hoffman-Schmitz vs Tammy Willett / Glenda Craddock6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAdrienne Rylander / Dawn Curran vs Donna Jones / Marcela Anongos6-3, 6-1
2023-06-28vs DomanskiLost 01
L#1 DoublesAdrienne Rylander / Lynn McNelis vs Glenda Craddock / Marcela Anongos6-2, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Norfolk Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Shawen Bartol
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.61
Veronica Cummings
published
3.58
Joan Corkery
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.51
Cary Kelly
published 3.5
3.27
Adrienne Rylander
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Lynn McNelis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shawen Bartol + Joan Corkery7453% games−5.1% vs expected
Adrienne Rylander + Shawen Bartol303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Shawen Bartol
73W–36L career · 6 lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.67
Veronica Cummings
9W–6L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.61
4
Joan Corkery
64W–57L career · 3 lines in 2023
28%71%<1%
3.58
3.5
Cary Kelly
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Adrienne Rylander
46W–59L career · 5 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Lynn McNelis
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.