Teams

Brown & Chase: Genesis

2025 IA 40 & Over Adult League · 4.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 4.17 / IOWA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-01-18vs Morrissey & Hill-Matthes: LifetimeLost 12
L#1 DoublesLynette Brown / Heather Ditsworth vs Rachel Morrissey / Korri ClarkWilt2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesTerri Dial vs Allison Davidson Motoyama6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesGreta Rath / Debbie Mackaman vs Kim Gillum / Siri Long5-7, 1-6
2024-11-23vs Morrissey & Hill-Matthes: LifetimeSplit 22
W#1 DoublesLynette Brown / Karen Barnes vs Brittni Redding / Jenn Smith7-5, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAimee Walsh vs Allison Davidson Motoyama3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLindsay Chase / Jennifer Fejfar vs Rachel Johannsen / Kim Gillum6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesGreta Rath / Debbie Mackaman vs Deana Hoganson / Holly Shortenhaus6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 DoublesJennifer Fejfar / Karen Barnes vs Mary Ellerbroek / Rachel Morrissey6-0, 6-4
L#1 SinglesGreta Rath vs Heidi Hill-Matthes3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLynette Brown / Angela Beaver vs Rachel Johannsen / Kim Gillum6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAngela Torgerson / Joy Johnson vs Korri ClarkWilt / Dina Dulaney6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 DoublesTerri Dial / Lindsay Chase vs Siri Long / Allison Davidson Motoyama6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJennie Henry / Greta Rath vs Kim Gillum / Rachel Johannsen2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAngela Torgerson / Angela Beaver vs Dina Dulaney / Holly Shortenhaus7-6, 6-3
L#1 DoublesJennifer Fejfar / Lindsay Chase vs Rachel Morrissey / Kim Gillum4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLynette Brown / Angela Beaver vs Rachel Johannsen / Dina Dulaney6-0, 7-5
W#3 DoublesAimee Walsh / Joy Johnson vs Kathleen Weyers / Korri ClarkWilt7-6, 6-1
W#1 DoublesSara Loetscher / Jennie Henry vs Kim Gillum / Rachel Morrissey7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDebbie Mackaman vs Deana Hoganson4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Fejfar / Karen Barnes vs Holly Shortenhaus / Jenn Smith6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLynette Brown / Angela Beaver vs Korri ClarkWilt / Kathleen Hansen6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Jennifer Fejfar
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.00
Joy Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.96
Angela Beaver
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.94
Jennie Henry
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.93
Terri Dial
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.83
Lindsay Chase
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.80
Sara Loetscher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Karen Barnes
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Debbie Mackaman
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Lynette Brown
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.50
Angela Torgerson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.09
Heather Ditsworth
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.02
Greta Rath
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Aimee Walsh
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennie Henry + Lindsay Chase5265% games+26.3% vs expected
Jennifer Fejfar + Jennie Henry3256% games+15.4% vs expected
Jennifer Fejfar + Lindsay Chase101055% games+10.4% vs expected
Jennifer Fejfar + Lynette Brown6054% games+0.1% vs expected
Angela Beaver + Lynette Brown4170% gamesnot enough data
Debbie Mackaman + Heather Ditsworth314 matchesnot enough data
Debbie Mackaman + Greta Rath134 matchesnot enough data
Angela Beaver + Jennie Henry123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Fejfar
33W–24L career · 4 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
4.01
Joy Johnson
43W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
4.00
4.5
Angela Beaver
21W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
3.96
Jennie Henry
26W–35L career · 2 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
3.94
Terri Dial
20W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.93
Lindsay Chase
48W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%88%12%
3.83
Sara Loetscher
33W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.80
Karen Barnes
16W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Debbie Mackaman
27W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lynette Brown
43W–28L career · 5 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Angela Torgerson
55W–31L career · 6 lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.50
Heather Ditsworth
53W–35L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.09
Greta Rath
68W–62L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.02
Aimee Walsh
4W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.