Teams

Washington-GGCC

2025 Adult 18 & Over-DLT · Women 3.0

11 players · average NTRP 2.79 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-13vs Myers-CCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Hanos / Angela Davis vs Lauren Shurden / Taylor Newton0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesApril Robertson vs Lauren Aldridge1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesAimee Washington vs Misty Moseley5-7, 6-7
2025-03-18vs Aylward/Shannon-CCCSplit 22
W#1 DoublesCarrie Ramsey Whitt / Lacy Bruton vs Amy Denton Maggio / Taylor Ward6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesApril Robertson vs Kelsey Spradling4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPaden Dawkins / Nadine Hayek vs Whitney Morgan / Brittany Bowen1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAimee Washington / Amy Maranto vs Mary DeWeese / Destiny Livingston6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.34 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Allison Montague
published 3
April Robertson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
Carrie Ramsey Whitt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.62
Aimee Washington
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.47
Nadine Hayek
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Elizabeth Hanos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.24
Paden Dawkins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.18
Ann Marie Smythe
published 2.5
2.17
Anna Haskins Patton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Lacey Brozovich
published
Lacy Bruton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Allison Montague
11W–20L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
April Robertson
3W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Carrie Ramsey Whitt
3W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Aimee Washington
17W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
2.62
Nadine Hayek
5W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.47
2.5
Elizabeth Hanos
1W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Paden Dawkins
4W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
0%98%2%
2.24
2.5
Ann Marie Smythe
1W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.18
2.5
Anna Haskins Patton
2W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.17
Lacey Brozovich
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lacy Bruton
10W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.