Teams

CPeterson-HVCC

2026 Eno River Adult 40 & Over · 40 Over Adult 3.0 Women Evening

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-22vs DBaker-DURWon 21
L#1 DoublesDeborah Hertzog / Barbara Wilhelm vs Diane Allen / Yolanda Deaver3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMelinda Duncker / Betsy Euler vs Kim Hutter / Kerry Espinola6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKensy Ryan / Kelly Moore vs Debbie Baker / Lula Melton6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2026-04-15vs TPrinstein-HRWon 30
W#1 DoublesCecily Peterson / Barbara Wilhelm vs Michelle Koeneke / Kristy Clare6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesStephanie Perun / Kelly Moore vs Jesse Shoemaker-Ramsey / Dana Okeefe6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKensy Ryan / Betsy Euler vs Ellie Turner / Amy Gillie6-1, 6-2
2026-04-13vs EPatulski-DURWon 31
W#1 DoublesDeborah Hertzog / Barbara Wilhelm vs Carin von Kahr / Katie Helms6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCecily Peterson vs Krissy Dunn6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesStephanie Perun / Elizabeth Yancy vs Kristin Isaacs / Edith Becerra5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCaroline Carrico / Kelly Jernigan vs Laurie Holderness / Jill Hathorn2-6, 1-6
2026-03-18vs JScaglione-TOCHWon 20
W#1 DoublesDeborah Hertzog / Barbara Wilhelm vs Amanda Laird / Sina Mathew6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSterling Ingui / Stephanie Perun vs Martha Martinez / Megan Prieto6-3, 6-1
2026-03-11vs DBaker-DURSplit 22
L#1 DoublesBarbara Wilhelm / Elizabeth Yancy vs Leslie Jackson / Kellianne White3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesCecily Peterson vs Lula Melton6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBetsy Euler / Stephanie Perun vs Debbie Baker / Yolanda Deaver6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCaroline Carrico / Kensy Ryan vs Diane Allen / Janet Ranheim2-6, 2-6
2026-03-04vs TPrinstein-HRLost 13
L#1 DoublesKelly Jernigan / Sterling Ingui vs Kristy Clare / CLARE MURRAY0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesCecily Peterson vs Nicole Dolan6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBetsy Euler / Kelly Moore vs Jesse Shoemaker-Ramsey / Jennifer Dunlap2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBarbara Wilhelm / Elizabeth Yancy vs Michelle Koeneke / Dana Okeefe4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-02-25vs EPatulski-DURWon 31
W#1 DoublesBarbara Wilhelm / Melinda Duncker vs Kristin Isaacs / Katie Helms6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesCecily Peterson vs Kristi Brubaker7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBetsy Euler / Kelly Moore vs Areli Grodski / Laurie Holderness6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCaroline Carrico / Sterling Ingui vs Emily Patulski / Carin von Kahr6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-02-11vs JScaglione-TOCHWon 21
W#1 DoublesDeborah Hertzog / Barbara Wilhelm vs Colleen Starns / Jamie Scaglione6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCecily Peterson / Sterling Ingui vs Megan Prieto / Onyi Dillibe6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKelly Jernigan / Holly Borden vs Amanda Laird / Gabriela Stefan2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 Over Adult 3.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Deborah Hertzog
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.06
Betsy Euler
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 3
3.04
Cecily Peterson
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
3.03
Melinda Duncker
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
3.03
Barbara Wilhelm
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 3
2.85
Stephanie Perun
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Holly Borden
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Caroline Carrico
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
Elizabeth Yancy
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.56
Kensy Ryan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.55
Sterling Ingui
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Betsy Euler + Melinda Duncker16855% games+8.3% vs expected
Deborah Hertzog + Barbara Wilhelm7454% games−9.0% vs expected
Elizabeth Yancy + Deborah Hertzog303 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Yancy + Barbara Wilhelm033 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Yancy + Stephanie Perun123 matchesnot enough data
Betsy Euler + Stephanie Perun213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Deborah Hertzog
37W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.06
3
Betsy Euler
140W–108L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.06
3
Cecily Peterson
209W–207L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.04
3
Melinda Duncker
80W–62L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Barbara Wilhelm
55W–49L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.03
3
Stephanie Perun
35W–67L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
2.85
3
Holly Borden
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3
Caroline Carrico
1W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Elizabeth Yancy
8W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
2.66
Kensy Ryan
13W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
2.56
3
Sterling Ingui
43W–79L career · 4 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
2.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.