Teams

OC Cabrillo - Stacy - Sun

2026 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - OC · OC Women WE - 4.0

17 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings9 teams · OC Women WE - 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OC Costa Mesa TC - Susie K - Sat9000000
2OC Seal Beach TC - Yolanda000000
3OC RCI - Melanie000000
4OC Cabrillo - Stacy - Sun000000
5OC NBTC - Jen - Sat1000000
6OC Los Cab - Armida - Sun11000000
7OC Cute on the Court - Mak Sun9000000
8OC Huntington Club - Cheryl - Sat11000000
9OC RCI - Bonnie Sun 12000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Cathy Jackson
published 4
3.77
Rikki Scharnell
published 4
3.75
Terri Rasmussen
published 4
3.75
Mary Thomas
published
3.74
Carrie Anderson
published 4
3.69
Gia Bao Le
published 4
3.66
Indrani Jackson
published 4
3.61
Jenny Tetley
published
3.61
Julie Hull
published 4
3.60
Michelle Haghani
published
3.59
Nancy Hirsch
published
3.59
3.58
Tammy Brusseau
published
3.56
Jody Brennan
published
3.52
Sarah Sapiro
published
3.50
Stacy Tzur
published
3.45
Julia Tuverson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jody Brennan + Stacy Tzur3448% games+9.3% vs expected
Sarah Sapiro + Julia Tuverson4167% games+6.7% vs expected
Terri Rasmussen + Cathy Jackson9165% games+5.1% vs expected
Indrani Jackson + Rikki Scharnell131155% games−2.3% vs expected
Rikki Scharnell + Rachel de Los Santos3743% games−3.0% vs expected
Julie Hull + Terri Rasmussen5547% gamesnot enough data
Indrani Jackson + Rachel de Los Santos3352% gamesnot enough data
Julie Hull + Rachel de Los Santos224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cathy Jackson
12W–8L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Rikki Scharnell
101W–99L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Terri Rasmussen
136W–90L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.75
Mary Thomas
3W–1L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Carrie Anderson
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Gia Bao Le
15W–15L career · no lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.69
4
Indrani Jackson
120W–69L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
3.66
Jenny Tetley
5W–3L career · no lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.61
4
Julie Hull
94W–108L career · no lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.61
Michelle Haghani
4W–7L career · no lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.60
Nancy Hirsch
3W–1L career · no lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.59
4
Rachel de Los Santos
68W–57L career · no lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.59
Tammy Brusseau
4W–4L career · no lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.58
Jody Brennan
9W–14L career · no lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.56
Sarah Sapiro
13W–2L career · no lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.52
Stacy Tzur
5W–20L career · no lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.50
Julia Tuverson
22W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.45

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.