← Teams

CRRC-Mosbrucker

2019 Adult 40 & Over · 2.5 Women

2 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.79
Carol Glenn
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.74
Nicola Ash
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3
Results7 ties
2019-06-30Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesCarol Glenn / Rhea Thornburg vs Tonya Mahler / Heather Dale6-1, 6-1
2019-06-23Won 1–0
W#1 SinglesCarol Glenn vs Irina Stolerman6-3, 6-1
2019-06-08Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesCheri Mosbrucker / Carol Glenn vs Wendy Buchanan / Tracy Laidley7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2019-05-29Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesCarol Glenn / Brenda Strombo vs Elizabeth Ayotte / Desiree Bliss0-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesNicola Ash vs Suzanne Puttman6-2, 7-5
2019-05-18Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesCheri Mosbrucker / Carol Glenn vs Denise Visse / Katie Simpson2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2019-05-11Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesNicola Ash / Carol Glenn vs Lisa Duerk / Elizabeth Zalpys3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2019-04-27Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesNicola Ash / Rhea Thornburg vs Yayun Tung / Monica Olson7-5, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Carol Glenn
82W–81L career
0%99%1%
2.79
3
Nicola Ash
114W–136L career
1%99%0%
2.74

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.