Teams

HOA/Gehrke/40&Over5.0W

2022 Adult 40 & Over 3.0 - 5.0 - Weekend · 5.0 Women (Open)

8 players · average NTRP 4.75 / HEART OF AMERICA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-04-10vs Gifford, MichelleWon 20
W#1 DoublesJill Waldman / Valerie Marks vs Lyndy Volker / Erin Gustafson6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesLorie Zacharias-Verdi / Andrea Wolfe vs Michelle Gifford / Michelle Clark6-1, 6-2
2022-04-03vs Gifford, MichelleWon 20
W#1 DoublesLorie Zacharias-Verdi / Valerie Marks vs Thresa Lampe / Michelle Clark6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJackie Gehrke / Andrea Wolfe vs Michelle Gifford / Melissa Juelis6-1, 6-5
2022-03-27vs Gifford, MichelleSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLorie Zacharias-Verdi / Valerie Marks vs Melissa Juelis / Deborah Fabrizius6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJackie Gehrke / Diane Kakareka vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-03-20vs Gifford, MichelleSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJackie Gehrke / Andrea Wolfe vs Thresa Lampe / Michelle Clark1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesFiona Rey / Valerie Marks vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-03-06vs Gifford, MichelleWon 20
W#1 DoublesLorie Zacharias-Verdi / Valerie Marks vs Lyndy Volker / Erin Gustafson7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAndrea Wolfe / Diane Kakareka vs Michelle Gifford / Michelle Clark6-3, 6-6
2022-02-27vs Gifford, MichelleWon 20
W#1 DoublesFiona Rey / Jill Waldman vs Thresa Lampe / Erin Gustafson6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAndrea Wolfe / Julia Wulff vs Michelle Clark / Samantha Pennington6-3, 6-2
2022-02-20vs Gifford, MichelleWon 20
W#1 DoublesFiona Rey / Jill Waldman vs Thresa Lampe / Lyndy Volker6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLorie Zacharias-Verdi / Julia Wulff vs Melissa Juelis / Deborah Fabrizius6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 5.0 Women (Open)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HOA/Gehrke/40&Over5.0W50100257
2Gifford, Michelle0501019122

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.47 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Andrea Wolfe
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 5
4.68
Jill Waldman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.60
Valerie Marks
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
4.48
Fiona Rey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.46
Jackie Gehrke
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.32
Lorie Zacharias-Verdi
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.25
Diane Kakareka
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Julia Wulff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diane Kakareka + Andrea Wolfe4355% games+7.0% vs expected
Valerie Marks + Lorie Zacharias-Verdi191755% games+2.1% vs expected
Lorie Zacharias-Verdi + Fiona Rey5350% games+1.7% vs expected
Fiona Rey + Jill Waldman7752% games−2.3% vs expected
Valerie Marks + Diane Kakareka4161% games−2.4% vs expected
Jackie Gehrke + Diane Kakareka6952% games−3.5% vs expected
Jackie Gehrke + Andrea Wolfe31043% games−8.5% vs expected
Valerie Marks + Andrea Wolfe2354% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Andrea Wolfe
30W–42L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
5
Jill Waldman
61W–31L career · 3 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
4.68
Valerie Marks
100W–57L career · 5 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
4.60
5
Fiona Rey
61W–35L career · 2 lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
4.48
4.5
Jackie Gehrke
158W–94L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
4.46
4.5
Lorie Zacharias-Verdi
120W–97L career · type A · 5 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
4.32
4.5
Diane Kakareka
51W–42L career · 1 line in 2022
2%95%3%
4.25
Julia Wulff
24W–6L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.