Teams

St.Cole55A

2024 Capital Adult 55 & Over · 3.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-07vs Jo.Cockerham55AWon 10
W#1 DoublesStephen Cole / Scott Hammond vs GEORGE ELLISON / Ken Haney6-4, 6-4
2024-04-30vs Da.Huffman55AWon 30
W#1 DoublesDavid Shuman / John Hulicki vs John Perry / David Hodl6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesStephen Cole / Scott Hammond vs Dane Huffman / Greg Byrd6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLewis Carroll / William Smith vs Cory Menees / Reginald B Gillespie Jr6-4, 6-4
2024-04-18vs Wi.Mooney55AWon 20
W#1 DoublesTerry White / John Hulicki vs Bert Clancey / Gregory McKenna7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesStephen Cole / Larry Ray vs Greg Kempf / William Mooney6-2, 6-1
2024-04-16vs Ro.Boyle55ALost 02
L#1 DoublesStephen Cole / Scott Hammond vs Roger Hatlen / Edward Poyo6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLewis Carroll / Jeffrey Miller vs Paul Brinckerhoff / Julian Barnes5-7, 4-6
2024-04-02vs Tod.Blevins55ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesJohn Hulicki / Thomas Milici vs Mark Zimmerman / Tim Lyon4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLewis Carroll / Eric Rubin vs John Cleary / Michael Campbell4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2024-03-12vs Jo.Parham55ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesJohn Hulicki / Scott Hammond vs McNair Bell / Kevin Manweiler6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesStephen Cole / Patrick Henig vs John van Campen / Rick Patton4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
John Hulicki
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Stephen Cole
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.20
Scott Hammond
published
3.15
Eric Rubin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Jeffrey Miller
published
2.89
Joseph Roney
published
2.85
Lewis Carroll
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Thomas Milici
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lewis Carroll + John Hulicki9255% gamesnot enough data
Stephen Cole + Lewis Carroll2445% gamesnot enough data
Jeffrey Miller + John Hulicki134 matchesnot enough data
Stephen Cole + John Hulicki314 matchesnot enough data
Stephen Cole + Scott Hammond303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
John Hulicki
162W–114L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%73%26%
3.41
3.5
Stephen Cole
68W–61L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.25
Scott Hammond
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
Eric Rubin
12W–12L career · 1 line in 2024
14%86%1%
3.15
Jeffrey Miller
18W–22L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%28%
2.92
Joseph Roney
7W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Lewis Carroll
52W–59L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
2.85
3
Thomas Milici
26W–28L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%2%
2.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.