Teams

Gooszen/40/6.5/WCN/STCC

2024 Shrev-Boss Southern Combo 40 & Over - Women Night · 6.5 Shrev

20 players · average NTRP 3.33 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 6.5 Shrev have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Sara Doughty
published
3.57
Kyla Fulco
published
Alison Marlar
published 3.5
3.22
Laura Gooszen
published
3.19
Stephanie Bass
published
3.15
Julie Spano
published
3.10
Darlene Dean
published 3.5
3.09
Courtney Matheny
published 3.5
3.09
Mary Tipton
published
3.08
Mary Jayroe
published
3.04
Christie Cox
published 3.5
3.01
Sarah Hatfield
published
2.97
Angie Wray
published 3
2.96
Kathy Barlow
published
2.89
Alisa Cotton
published 3
2.88
Tiffany Bell
published
2.86
Lila Knicely
published
2.83
Mona Cunningham
published
2.83
Rhonda Terracciano
published
2.56
Melinda Hernandez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Hatfield + Laura Gooszen4259% games+17.6% vs expected
Rhonda Terracciano + Mona Cunningham5351% games+6.3% vs expected
Alisa Cotton + Mona Cunningham5649% games+4.9% vs expected
Rhonda Terracciano + Christie Cox2347% games+3.0% vs expected
Darlene Dean + Laura Gooszen4352% games+1.3% vs expected
Darlene Dean + Christie Cox4748% games+0.9% vs expected
Kathy Barlow + Courtney Matheny1840% games+0.7% vs expected
Kyla Fulco + Sara Doughty5557% games−0.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sara Doughty
66W–35L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.66
Kyla Fulco
54W–63L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.57
3.5
Alison Marlar
1W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Laura Gooszen
48W–95L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Stephanie Bass
19W–20L career · no lines in 2024
9%89%1%
3.19
Julie Spano
17W–27L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Darlene Dean
28W–45L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.10
3.5
Courtney Matheny
29W–60L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.09
Mary Tipton
20W–50L career · no lines in 2024
26%73%<1%
3.09
Mary Jayroe
15W–32L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.08
3.5
Christie Cox
23W–59L career · no lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.04
Sarah Hatfield
33W–36L career · no lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
3.01
3
Angie Wray
65W–49L career · no lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
2.97
Kathy Barlow
12W–43L career · no lines in 2024
61%39%<1%
2.96
3
Alisa Cotton
17W–23L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
2.89
Tiffany Bell
4W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
2.88
Lila Knicely
12W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%15%
2.86
Mona Cunningham
31W–38L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
Rhonda Terracciano
53W–50L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
Melinda Hernandez
13W–21L career · no lines in 2024
34%65%<1%
2.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.