Teams

Stetelman 4.0 Mixed

2026 Mixed 18&Over-PB · 4.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-07-19vs Hattiesburg 4.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJackson Stanford / Saia Stetelman vs Hunter Holcomb / Makenzie Woodward1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesStewart Gammill / Carly Wise vs Zachary Christ / Lauren Sullivan6-7, 1-6
2026-07-12vs Hattiesburg 4.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesStewart Gammill / Logan Smithers vs Wesley Bailey / Dallas Tanner0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCarrie Olsson / Terence Payne vs Landon Black / Danielle Black3-6, 2-6
2026-06-28vs Hattiesburg 4.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJackson Stanford / Carly Wise vs Hunter Holcomb / Dallas Tanner2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesStewart Gammill / Elizabeth Asmar vs Noah Rowell / Makenzie Woodward1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesTerence Payne / Carrie Olsson vs Wesley Bailey / Allison Mayers7-5, 1-6, 1-0
2026-06-22vs Hattiesburg 4.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSaia Stetelman / Terence Payne vs Paul Pratt / Allison Mayers6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJackson Stanford / Carly Wise vs John Bishop / Courtney Gianola6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesStewart Gammill / Logan Smithers vs Landon Black / Danielle Black4-6, 3-6
2026-06-15vs Hattiesburg 4.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJackson Stanford / Carly Wise vs Zachary Christ / Lauren Sullivan2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesBrendan Fay / Logan Smithers vs Noah Rowell / Dallas Tanner3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesStewart Gammill / Saia Stetelman vs Wesley Bailey / Regan Rhian Parker3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hattiesburg 4.050141377
2Stetelman 4.0 Mixed0511429180

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Carly Wise
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.73
Stewart Gammill
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.63
Carrie Olsson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.60
Terence Payne
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.47
Brendan Fay
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.44
Saia Stetelman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.41
Elizabeth Asmar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Logan Smithers
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Graham Lightsey
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carly Wise
23W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.91
Stewart Gammill
2W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Carrie Olsson
12W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.63
Terence Payne
16W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.60
4
Brendan Fay
8W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
58%42%<1%
3.47
Saia Stetelman
9W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.44
Elizabeth Asmar
14W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%74%25%
3.41
Logan Smithers
5W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
76%24%<1%
3.40
Graham Lightsey
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.