Teams

TOC.Nowell

2026 CTRL Adult 65 & Over · Adult 65 & Over 4.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.92 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-03-29vs TOC.MadiaLost 03
L#1 DoublesBill Brown / Daniel Knox vs Jeffrey Madia / Cliff Ray4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKen Nowell / Edwal Stone vs Richard Kimball / Roger Kurtz2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTerry Davidson / Steven Miller vs David Morse / Cecil Martin3-6, 4-6
2026-03-22vs TOC.MadiaSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKen Nowell / Edwal Stone vs Norman Whitfield / William Finger6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSteven Miller / Terry Davidson vs Jeffrey Madia / David Bruner2-6, 6-7
2026-03-15vs TOC.MadiaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesEdwal Stone / Terry Davidson vs Roger Kurtz / Jeffrey Madia2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDaniel Knox / Bill Brown vs David Bruner / Cecil Martin6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-03-12vs TOC.MadiaLost 01
L#1 DoublesKen Nowell / Bill Brown vs Richard Kimball / David Morse2-6, 5-7
2026-03-08vs TOC.MadiaLost 12
W#1 DoublesDaniel Knox / Bill Brown vs David Bruner / Roger Kurtz5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMorten Pedersen / Steven Miller vs Cecil Martin / Cliff Ray1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKen Nowell / Larry Essary vs David Morse / S Hemphill5-7, 2-6
2026-03-01vs TOC.MadiaWon 21
W#1 DoublesDaniel Knox / Morten Pedersen vs William Finger / Richard Kimball6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEdwal Stone / Terry Davidson vs Jeffrey Madia / David Morse3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKen Nowell / Bill Brown vs Cecil Martin / S Hemphill6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 65 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Edwal Stone
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.76
Bill Brown
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.76
Ken Nowell
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.62
Larry Essary
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Gerard Auvergne
published 4
3.33
Terry Davidson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.29
Morten Pedersen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Paul Wiegand
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Edwal Stone + Ken Nowell4259% games+8.5% vs expected
Ken Nowell + Bill Brown123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Edwal Stone
51W–73L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Bill Brown
3W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
3.76
4
Ken Nowell
211W–146L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Larry Essary
109W–138L career · 1 line in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.62
4
Gerard Auvergne
46W–77L career · no lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
3.52
Terry Davidson
0W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
89%11%<1%
3.33
3.5
Morten Pedersen
78W–71L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
Paul Wiegand
1W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.