Teams

Bethany Bounds

2026 Combo Doubles 18&Over-NE · Women 6.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.17 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-27vs Beck/ Burk 6.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesErin Jones / Riley Pearcs vs Ashley Gilliland / Danielle Burk6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKayla Reynolds / Reika Sato vs Suzanne Cervantes / Loren Duke6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLauren Zuelzke / Margaret Maxwell vs Bonnie Mize / Alicia Green6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2026-08-26vs Huffstatler 18+ 6.5Lost 12
W#1 DoublesReika Sato / Kayla Reynolds vs Michelle Lindsey / Lacey Harden6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesAlicia Milstead / Erin Jones vs Elizabeth Gatlin / Susanne Lindsey1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesAmanda Sullivan / Joy Whittle vs Briley Clement / Sara Gammill3-6, 0-6
2026-08-19vs HowellSplit 11
W#1 DoublesReika Sato / Tammy Chapman vs Elise Mcmasters / Kelly Young6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesCarley Johnston / Candace Browning vs Susanne Lindsey / Kelly Gregory4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 6.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Howell1021223
2Bethany Bounds0112426

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Carley Johnston
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.95
Reika Sato
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.92
Tracie Grammer
published
2.79
April Gray
published 3
2.68
Joy Whittle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Kayla Reynolds
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.59
Lauren Zuelzke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Alicia Milstead
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.31
Riley Pearcs
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kayla Reynolds + Joy Whittle6357% games+13.6% vs expected
Alicia Milstead + April Gray7454% games+5.5% vs expected
Joy Whittle + Reika Sato404 matchesnot enough data
Carley Johnston + Reika Sato213 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Zuelzke + Alicia Milstead123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carley Johnston
33W–29L career · 1 line in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
Reika Sato
34W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.95
Tracie Grammer
16W–41L career · no lines in 2026
74%26%<1%
2.92
3
April Gray
15W–15L career · no lines in 2026
1%93%5%
2.79
Joy Whittle
42W–46L career · 1 line in 2026
0%8%92%
2.68
Kayla Reynolds
46W–33L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%11%89%
2.66
Lauren Zuelzke
9W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
2.59
3
Alicia Milstead
34W–38L career · 2 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
2.58
Riley Pearcs
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.31

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.