Teams

3 RVA Gentlemen

2022 Richmond Adult 55 & Over Men · Richmond Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.42 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-08-16vs 2 ACAC KochLost 01
L#2 DoublesFrank Mason / Brad Williamson vs Kevin Price / John Jones5-7, 2-6
2022-08-09Won 10
W#3 DoublesRichard Bland / Paul Haley vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-08-04vs 8 ACAC McFaddenWon 10
W#1 DoublesTom Foster / Richard Bland vs Robert Thoms / Aurelio David6-3, 6-2
2022-08-02Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDean Deaver / Brad Williamson vs John N Scott / Jeff Shifflett4-6, 3-6
2022-07-19vs 9 Avalon McKelveyWon 21
W#1 DoublesDean Deaver / Brad Williamson vs Mark Schultz / Yan Wu1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRichard Bland / Tom Foster vs James Melson / Gregory Blouch4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRonnie Erice / Gabriel Ghita vs Glenn Mizrach / Jason Hetherington6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2022-07-12vs 7 acac Stephens Advance 7.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRichard Bland / Brad Williamson vs Venkatachelam Regulagedda / Kevin Cousins3-6, 4-6
2022-07-05Won 10
W#1 DoublesDean Deaver / Brad Williamson vs William Bryan / David Martin6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2022-06-21vs 1 RidgeTop BarilaWon 10
W#1 DoublesTom Foster / Richard Bland vs Edwin Robinson / Clem Ulrichs6-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Robert Calhoun
published
3.33
Brad Williamson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.32
Richard Bland
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.30
Gabriel Ghita
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Paul Haley
published
Dean Deaver
published 3.5
3.17
Ronnie Erice
published
3.15
Frank Mason
published 3.5
2.83
Gary Woods
published 3
Tom Foster
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gabriel Ghita + Robert Calhoun7163% games+4.9% vs expected
Brad Williamson + Richard Bland241253% games+0.8% vs expected
Gabriel Ghita + Richard Bland1442% gamesnot enough data
Brad Williamson + Gabriel Ghita123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robert Calhoun
28W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
Brad Williamson
176W–167L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Richard Bland
251W–138L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Gabriel Ghita
137W–80L career · 1 line in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Paul Haley
30W–34L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Dean Deaver
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Ronnie Erice
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%1%
3.17
3.5
Frank Mason
6W–13L career · no lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.15
3
Gary Woods
6W–19L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
2.83
Tom Foster
11W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.