Teams

Dagger 6.5 Combo 18s Wed

2023 Piedmont Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Women 18 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.21 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-09-27vs Allred 6.5 Combo 18s WedWon 10
W#1 DoublesSally Bowman / Susan Roach vs Katie Boon / AMANDA ELDER6-0, 6-0
2023-09-06vs Hemric / Farley 6.5 Combo 18+ WedWon 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Roach / Ariel Holtzman vs Erin Bodine / Leslie Hemric6-4, 7-6
2023-08-30vs Flanagan 6.5 Combo 18+WedLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan Roach / Ariel Holtzman vs Layne Saunders / Reeves Rhoten4-6, 2-6
2023-08-23vs Jones 6.5 Combo 18s WedWon 10
W#2 DoublesSusan Roach / Aphton Lang vs Linda Shuster / Susan Shughart6-4, 6-0
2023-08-16vs Yates 6.5 Combo 18s WedWon 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Roach / Ariel Holtzman vs Jennifer Yates / Rebecca Morrison7-5, 6-4
2023-08-09vs Davis/Goy 6.5 Combo 18s Wed PMLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan Roach / Ashley Bethel vs Thais Warwar / Katie Bir2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Susan Roach
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.30
Audrey Snyder
published 3.5
3.30
Aphton Lang
published 3.5
3.14
Heidi Boswell
published 3.5
3.10
Sally Bowman
published
3.04
Janet Howard
published
2.96
Courtney Dagger
published 3
2.94
Ariel Holtzman
published 3
2.91
Ashton Choros
published 3
Ashley Bethel
published 3
2.74
Lindsey Blackwell
published
Karen Hartley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aphton Lang + Heidi Boswell314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Roach
122W–43L career · 6 lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.59
3.5
Audrey Snyder
36W–13L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.30
3.5
Aphton Lang
23W–18L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Heidi Boswell
25W–13L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%<1%
3.14
Sally Bowman
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%22%78%
3.10
Janet Howard
6W–15L career · no lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.04
3
Courtney Dagger
37W–29L career · no lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Ariel Holtzman
24W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Ashton Choros
16W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Ashley Bethel
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lindsey Blackwell
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
2.74
Karen Hartley
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.