Teams

Huguenot - Kelley

2023 Duval Adult 55 & Over - Women ESL Fall · 7.0 Adult 55 & Over Women Fall

12 players · average NTRP 3.40 / REGION_2

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
L#3 DoublesTammy Oswald / Vandi Cole vs Colette Sova-Wamsley / Kim Loferski3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-12-03vs Eagle Landing - BrinkLost 02
L#1 DoublesRebecca Smith / Diane Stone vs Lan Nguyen / Lisa Rangeo2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesVandi Cole / Rosalyn Perea vs Susan Brink / Jacqueline Harris2-6, 2-6
2022-10-22Won 10
W#2 DoublesVandi Cole / Katherine Sanborn vs Jacqueline Harris / Denise Graham6-3, 6-2
2022-09-17vs Boone Park - CohenWon 10
W#1 DoublesRebecca Smith / Diane Stone vs Joie Marsh / Tara Galaydick6-3, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult 55 & Over Women Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Vandi Cole
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Carol Kelley
published 3.5
3.38
Diane Stone
published 3.5
3.19
Tammy Oswald
published
3.18
Lois Robichaud
published
3.07
Cherie Johnson
published 3.5
3.07
Cheryl Matthews
published 3
3.04
Judith Daniel
published
2.98
Connie Rouls
published 3.5
2.88
Teresa Westerman
published
Katherine Sanborn
published
Rebecca Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tammy Oswald + Vandi Cole7548% games−1.8% vs expected
Connie Rouls + Lois Robichaud033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Vandi Cole
78W–46L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Carol Kelley
24W–21L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%19%
3.38
3.5
Diane Stone
24W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.38
Tammy Oswald
18W–19L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.19
Lois Robichaud
8W–13L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Cherie Johnson
8W–17L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.07
3
Cheryl Matthews
7W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%32%68%
3.07
Judith Daniel
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.04
3.5
Connie Rouls
1W–14L career · no lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
2.98
Teresa Westerman
0W–7L career · no lines in 2023
80%20%<1%
2.88
Katherine Sanborn
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rebecca Smith
26W–36L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.