Teams

Hattier/40/4.0/MD/BOC

2026 BR Mixed 40 & Over · 4.0 BR (40&O) Mixed

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-28vs Martin/40/4.0/MD/BRECSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDuke Minton / Ameeneh Langlois vs Martin Padial / Allison Rovira6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesUmut Meraler / Lisa Scalise vs Charles Walters / Tammy Noonan2-6, 4-6
2026-07-23vs Hamilton/40/4.0/MD/SOACLost 03
L#1 DoublesUmut Meraler / Cindy Barksdale vs Travis Eiermann / Kimberly Boria5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMicah Schilling / Lisa Scalise vs Chad Hamilton / Tracy Hamilton6-2, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Edmonson / Mike Williams vs Heidi Thompson / David Thompson3-6, 4-6
2026-07-09vs BUTLER/40/4.0/MD/BRECWon 21
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Edmonson / Jason Doiron vs Lisa Marie Raiford / Justin Miller6-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesDuke Minton / Ameeneh Langlois vs Kathryn Loveless / Tom Crowell6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHeather Jayson / Umut Meraler vs Hollie Easterling / Nam Nguyen6-3, 7-6
2026-07-08vs Hamilton/40/4.0/MD/SOACLost 12
W#1 DoublesDuke Minton / Sylvia Sutton vs Heidi Thompson / David Thompson7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesHeather Jayson / Jason Kelly vs Kimberly Boria / Bo Breeden1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Scalise / Mike Williams vs Kimi Hart / Stephen Politz3-6, 3-6
2026-06-18vs Fontenot/40/4.0/MD/BRECLost 03
L#1 DoublesKevin Simpson / Cindy Barksdale vs Amy Twitchell / DEREK MICHELL4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesShannon Hattier / Umut Meraler vs Donald Lund / Donna Armentor3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesHeather Jayson / Jason Kelly vs Markus Wilson / Natalie Anding4-6, 5-7
2026-06-04vs Martin/40/4.0/MD/BRECLost 03
L#1 DoublesKevin Simpson / Sylvia Sutton vs Dan Gardiner / Courtney McGraw6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMicah Schilling / Shannon Hattier vs Andree Padial / Bradley Allen3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDuke Minton / Heather Jayson vs Shawna Gardiner / Charles Walters1-6, 3-6
2026-05-28vs BUTLER/40/4.0/MD/BRECLost 12
L#1 DoublesUmut Meraler / Sylvia Sutton vs Kathryn Loveless / Justin Miller4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Guillot / Shannon Hattier vs Kelley Butler / Tom Crowell0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesSuzanne Edmonson / Mike Williams vs Lisa Marie Raiford / Nam Nguyen6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-05-07vs Fontenot/40/4.0/MD/BRECLost 12
W#1 DoublesUmut Meraler / Ameeneh Langlois vs Jason Hawkins / Donna Armentor6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesShannon Hattier / Mike Williams vs Mandy LaCerte / Thomas Miglicco1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDuke Minton / Lisa Scalise vs Markus Wilson / Rebecca Savoie6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 4.0 BR (40&O) Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hamilton/40/4.0/MD/SOAC8021312155
2Martin/40/4.0/MD/BREC6217718178
3Fontenot/40/4.0/MD/BREC44111333255
4Hattier/40/4.0/MD/BOC1761838259
5BUTLER/40/4.0/MD/BREC1751938255

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Sylvia Sutton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.95
Duke Minton
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.83
Ameeneh Langlois
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.82
Umut Meraler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.82
Suzanne Edmonson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.77
Micah Schilling
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.74
Cindy Barksdale
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Kevin Simpson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Lisa Scalise
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.56
Jason Doiron
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Shannon Hattier
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Heather Jayson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Jason Kelly
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Michael Guillot
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Umut Meraler + Shannon Hattier033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sylvia Sutton
11W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.96
Duke Minton
11W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.95
4
Ameeneh Langlois
48W–29L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.83
Umut Meraler
11W–19L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
Suzanne Edmonson
42W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
3.82
Micah Schilling
6W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Cindy Barksdale
18W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.74
Kevin Simpson
10W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
Lisa Scalise
18W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.62
Jason Doiron
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.56
Shannon Hattier
7W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
3.52
Heather Jayson
30W–36L career · 4 lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
3.52
Jason Kelly
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Guillot
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.