Teams

TLeFevre 7.5 40+

2022 Capital Combo 40 & Over · 7.5 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-14vs SWood-BCCC 7.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesTara LeFevre / Tina Santospago vs Tammy Kozacko / Meike Schacht4-6, 2-6
2022-10-12vs ARobinsonSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJennie Williams / Christy Team vs Allison Crumpler / LeAnne Bloedon6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJacqueline Wolborsky / Tina Santospago vs Brooke Somers / Kristi Koren0-6, 1-6
2022-10-07vs JSauls/GallagherLost 01
L#1 DoublesLynda McDonell / Christy Team vs Judith Gallagher / Julie Sauls2-6, 5-7
2022-09-23vs LHOLDINGLost 02
L#1 DoublesLynda McDonell / Christy Team vs Melanie Tharrington / Amanda Williams4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTina Santospago / Sarah Bell vs Lisa Gwyn / Jennifer Hogshead2-6, 4-6
2022-09-16vs TCrisp40comboLost 01
L#3 DoublesTara LeFevre / Debra Phillips vs Tracy Crisp / Kana Brinckerhoff1-6, 2-6
2022-09-09vs SRABBYWon 20
W#1 DoublesKristin Sobey / Christy Team vs Chris Buscher / Dana Weiland6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJacqueline Wolborsky / Tina Santospago vs Jennifer Boyd / Lee Perry6-3, 6-2
2022-08-26vs KTownsend/LRoss (40+ 7.5)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLynda McDonell / Christy Team vs Jenny Nguyen / Kelly Townsend4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-08-19vs LRandallWon 20
W#1 DoublesLynda McDonell / Christy Team vs Laurie Randall / Michelle Welborn7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJacqueline Wolborsky / Martha Zurawel vs Diane Werner / Kathleen Henig6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Christy Team
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Debra Phillips
published 3.5
3.20
Jacqueline Wolborsky
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Tara LeFevre
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.73
Tina Santospago
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacqueline Wolborsky + Tina Santospago6450% gamesnot enough data
Tara LeFevre + Jacqueline Wolborsky224 matchesnot enough data
Tina Santospago + Christy Team224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christy Team
150W–90L career · 12 lines in 2022
75%25%<1%
3.41
3.5
Debra Phillips
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Jacqueline Wolborsky
66W–46L career · 4 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Tara LeFevre
199W–175L career · 6 lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.14
3
Tina Santospago
51W–74L career · 6 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.