Teams

RFC:Her-i-cane-2:Pease

2021 ME Adult 65 & Over Women · 7.0 65 & Over Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MAINE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-06-25vs RFC:TennisStateofMind:BonninWon 20
W#2 DoublesCharlotte Pease / Elaine Dube vs Ellen Groleau / Gwen Lambert7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAnita Johnston / Caroline Pratt vs Kathleen Gagne / Linda Coupe6-1, 6-3
2021-06-18vs RFC:TennisStateofMind:BonninLost 02
L#2 DoublesCharlotte Pease / Rebecca Love vs Ellen Groleau / Gwen Lambert3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesAnita Johnston / Elaine Dube vs Ann Harradon / Sue Dermond3-6, 3-6
2021-06-11vs RFC:TennisStateofMind:BonninSplit 11
L#2 DoublesSarah McIntyre / Charlotte Pease vs Susan Steinman / Gwen Lambert1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesLaurie Burger / Anita Johnston vs Linda Coupe / Sue Fels6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2021-06-04vs RFC:TennisStateofMind:BonninWon 21
L#1 DoublesAnita Johnston / Caroline Pratt vs Carol Epstein / Susan Steinman3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRebecca Love / Sarah McIntyre vs Sue Dermond / Gwen Lambert7-5, 7-5
W#3 DoublesLaurie Burger / Elaine Dube vs Kathleen Gagne / Ann Harradon6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.0 65 & Over Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RFC:TennisStateofMind:Bonnin227510110
2RFC:Her-i-cane-2:Pease225715124

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.84
Rebecca Love
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Charlotte Pease
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Elaine Dube
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Anita Johnston
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Caroline Pratt
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Judy Sevigny
published
Laurie Burger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sylvia Leblanc
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anita Johnston + Laurie Burger4249% gamesnot enough data
Anita Johnston + Caroline Pratt1444% gamesnot enough data
Anita Johnston + Charlotte Pease3254% gamesnot enough data
Rebecca Love + Charlotte Pease134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rebecca Love
20W–26L career · 2 lines in 2021
89%11%<1%
2.84
3
Charlotte Pease
35W–71L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Elaine Dube
7W–17L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Anita Johnston
20W–22L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Caroline Pratt
5W–9L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Judy Sevigny
16W–33L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Laurie Burger
12W–18L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Sylvia Leblanc
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.