Teams

McCall - RS Clay

2021 Escambia Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.07 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-06-30vs Escambia - RS/BradfordWon 10
W#1 DoublesTami McGhee / Shellie McCall vs Renee Bradford / Mandy Blair6-3, 6-0
2021-06-23vs Rhone - RS ClayWon 10
W#2 DoublesShellie McCall / Darlene Warner vs Tonna Wheat / Chelsea Simpson4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-06-16vs Gandy - SHLWon 20
W#1 DoublesAmber Fletcher / Shellie McCall vs Tammy Crump / Heather Doerr7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMary Jane Evertz / Whitney Calametti vs Lee Ann Pugh / Amelia Gandy6-3, 6-0
2021-06-09vs Gandy - SHLWon 20
W#1 DoublesShellie McCall / Denise Lebert vs Lee Ann Pugh / Wanda Chapman6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAmber Fletcher / Whitney Calametti vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-06-02vs Rhone - RS ClayWon 20
W#2 DoublesTami McGhee / Shellie McCall vs Tonna Wheat / Leigh Clark6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesWhitney Calametti / Jeshua Reddecliff vs Mecy Wimberly / Kristyn Miller6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2021-05-26vs Escambia - RS/BradfordSplit 11
L#1 DoublesShellie McCall / Whitney Calametti vs Whitney Sumrall / Charlotte Stark3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDebbie Cook / Tami McGhee vs Renee Bradford / Jena Wise6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.19
Amber Fletcher
published 4.5
3.91
Shellie McCall
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.84
Whitney Calametti
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.83
Tami McGhee
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.78
Debbie Cook
published 4
Ann Loehr
published 4
3.64
Gina Bevino
published 4
3.56
Marina Agadzi
published
Jeshua Reddecliff
published
Kathleen Helton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shellie McCall + Tami McGhee18859% games−3.8% vs expected
Shellie McCall + Gina Bevino6453% gamesnot enough data
Shellie McCall + Whitney Calametti3549% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Amber Fletcher
14W–10L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
4.19
4
Shellie McCall
158W–68L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Whitney Calametti
68W–40L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%89%10%
3.84
4
Tami McGhee
101W–56L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Debbie Cook
6W–1L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Ann Loehr
2W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Gina Bevino
43W–34L career · no lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
3.64
Marina Agadzi
42W–59L career · no lines in 2021
32%68%<1%
3.56
Jeshua Reddecliff
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Kathleen Helton
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.