Teams

Jackson - RCH

2023 Combo Doubles 18&Over-PB · Women 5.5

7 players · average NTRP 2.75 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Paula Morris
published
2.88
Julianne Moore
published
2.74
Sarah Bolton
published
2.74
Ashley Vance
published 3
Amy Gardner Sutton
published 2.5
Kaitlyn Hennessey
published
Mabry Shook
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paula Morris
45W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%30%70%
3.07
Julianne Moore
18W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
2.88
Sarah Bolton
37W–29L career · no lines in 2023
0%4%96%
2.74
3
Ashley Vance
48W–29L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
2.74
2.5
Amy Gardner Sutton
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kaitlyn Hennessey
31W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mabry Shook
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.