Teams

SASS

2023 One Doubles · 3.5 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3.67 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Lorna Goth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Tammy LaFrazia
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Heidi Kjos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2023-08-10Lost 01
L#1 DoublesHeidi Kjos / Tammy LaFrazia vs Parish Burns / Nina Hanson6-1, 6-3
2023-08-04Won 10
W#1 DoublesHeidi Kjos / Susan McMullin vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-08-02Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan McMullin / Tammy LaFrazia vs Angie Stromquist / Gabriela McIntosh7-5, 6-2
2023-07-21Lost 01
L#1 DoublesHeidi Kjos / Lorna Goth vs Lyudmila Leissler / Cathleen Lang7-5, 6-4
2023-07-11Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan McMullin / Tammy LaFrazia vs Amy Ouellette / Michelle Johnson6-3, 6-4
2023-07-06Lost 01
L#1 DoublesHeidi Kjos / Tammy LaFrazia vs Tanya Wong / Michele Snyder6-0, 6-0
2023-06-29Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTammy LaFrazia / Lorna Goth vs Carly Vendegna / Kari Hastings6-2, 6-2
2023-06-27Won 10
W#1 DoublesLorna Goth / Heidi Kjos vs Garrene Mcgale / Chelsea Place6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Lorna Goth
124W–51L career
1%99%0%
3.77
3.5
Tammy LaFrazia
44W–25L career
not enough data
3.5
Heidi Kjos
74W–115L career
14%86%0%
3.09

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.