Teams

GEPTA/Adult 4.0M/Dominguez/EPTC#8

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

14 players · average NTRP / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-06-01Lost 01
L#2 SinglesJose Ulate vs DOHYUN KIM0-6, 0-6
2025-04-09Lost 01
L#2 DoublesManish Suktankar / Enrique Darancou vs Luis Manriquez / Jesus Martinez0-6, 1-6
2025-03-16vs GEPTA/Adult 4.0M/LMelendez/EPTC#1Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJacob Saavedra / Jose Ulate vs Peter Melendez / Rudy Motta1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesMartin Saenzpardo vs Luis Herrera2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2025 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Enrique Darancou
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Jacob Saavedra
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jon Saenz
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Jose Ulate
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Luis Dominguez
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published
Manish Suktankar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Manuel Barrera
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Martin Lechuga
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Martin Saenzpardo
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Michael Bezemek
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Oswaldo Rojas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Rene Diaz
usually #1 Singles 42%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Robert Saucedo
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Timothy Vida
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Manuel Barrera + Luis Dominguez17558% gamesnot enough data
Jose Ulate + Jacob Saavedra01020% gamesnot enough data
Michael Bezemek + Luis Dominguez3257% gamesnot enough data
Michael Bezemek + Jon Saenz314 matchesnot enough data
Manuel Barrera + Oswaldo Rojas314 matchesnot enough data
Manuel Barrera + Jacob Saavedra123 matchesnot enough data
Manuel Barrera + Robert Saucedo303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Enrique Darancou
28W–23L career · 11 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jacob Saavedra
23W–59L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jon Saenz
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jose Ulate
0W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Luis Dominguez
63W–49L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Manish Suktankar
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Manuel Barrera
47W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Martin Lechuga
21W–38L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Martin Saenzpardo
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Michael Bezemek
96W–84L career · 28 lines in 2025
not enough data
Oswaldo Rojas
7W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Rene Diaz
19W–16L career · 11 lines in 2025
not enough data
Robert Saucedo
7W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Timothy Vida
10W–43L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.