← Teams

LOTC-Brewer

2019 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men

2 players · average NTRP 3.25 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Jeff Ruby
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.77
Paul Kachel
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Results7 ties
2019-02-24Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesDouglas Brewer / Jeff Ruby vs Allan Warman / Pete Jacobs6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2019-02-16Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesCalvin Chen / Paul Kachel vs Rob Shiffer / James Thomas6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDavid Mealey / Jeff Ruby vs Zachary Wright / Morgan Bonar5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2019-02-02Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesDavid Mealey / Paul Kachel vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2019-01-27Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesDavid Mealey / Jeff Ruby vs Leo Edmunson / Sundar Ramamurthy6-2, 6-1
2019-01-20Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesCalvin Chen / Paul Kachel vs Byung Ji / Robert Burlingame5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2019-01-13Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesPaul Kachel / Calvin Chen vs Mark Choi / William Godfrey7-6, 6-3
2019-01-06Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesCalvin Chen / Paul Kachel vs Amir Tadjedin / Rob Chandler6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDavid Mealey / Jeff Ruby vs Alan Karpinski / Ben Hoerster7-6, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Jeff Ruby
22W–43L career
35%65%0%
3.00
3
Paul Kachel
19W–29L career
7%87%6%
2.77

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.