Teams

ALPINE HILLS CW7.5A

2025 COMBO · Women 7.5

23 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Sarah Speakman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Bonnie Crater
published 4
3.75
Lynn Mickleburgh
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.74
Alison Rosenthal
published 3.5
3.74
Jessica Berg
published
3.59
Heather Wolfe
published
3.58
Katja Gagen
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.58
3.57
Renata Quintini
published
3.45
Mary Jo Kloezeman
published
3.42
Kate Fenwick
published
3.42
Allison Carlson
published 3.5
3.40
Wendy Mcadam
published
3.27
Shannon Basch
published
3.23
3.19
Joi Deaser
published
3.15
Caren Taylor
published 3.5
3.13
Sally Aalfs
published
3.12
Tina Molumphy
published
3.06
Kristina Paszek
published
2.97
Sally Ann Reiss
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Johonna Katz
published
Silke Roedder
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wendy Mcadam + Tina Molumphy3253% games+5.8% vs expected
Susan Miller Hornbeek + Tina Molumphy213 matchesnot enough data
Mary Jo Kloezeman + Joi Deaser303 matchesnot enough data
Allison Carlson + Kate Fenwick213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Speakman
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
66%34%<1%
3.94
4
Bonnie Crater
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lynn Mickleburgh
6W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.75
3.5
Alison Rosenthal
14W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%4%96%
3.74
Jessica Berg
8W–3L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
Heather Wolfe
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.59
Katja Gagen
36W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.58
Michelle Breman Olson
2W–11L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.58
Renata Quintini
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
Mary Jo Kloezeman
11W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.45
Kate Fenwick
11W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.42
3.5
Allison Carlson
15W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%27%
3.42
Wendy Mcadam
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
3.40
Shannon Basch
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Susan Miller Hornbeek
10W–7L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Joi Deaser
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.19
3.5
Caren Taylor
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
Sally Aalfs
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
Tina Molumphy
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
Kristina Paszek
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
Sally Ann Reiss
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.97
Johonna Katz
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Silke Roedder
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.