Teams

Fendley/18&O/4.0/MD/RPAR

2025 Ruston Mixed 18 & Over · 4.0 Ruston (18&O) Mixed

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-07-28vs Taylor/18&O/4.0/MD/RPARWon 20
W#1 DoublesGraham Lemoine / Mary Fendley vs Wen Huang / Tish Jowers6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAlan Smith / Katie Cracraft vs Chandler Ashworth / Barbara Johnson6-2, 6-4
2025-07-26vs Taylor/18&O/4.0/MD/RPARLost 12
L#1 DoublesGraham Lemoine / Katie Cracraft vs Wen Huang / Elise Nichols6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMary Fendley / Alan Smith vs Vijaydeep Singh / Tabitha Nankya1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesCollin Wick / DeEtte Wick vs Gage Batterton / Tish Jowers7-6, 6-1
2025-07-21vs Taylor/18&O/4.0/MD/RPARLost 12
L#1 DoublesCollin Wick / DeEtte Wick vs Wen Huang / Elise Nichols0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAlan Smith / Lauryn Brooks vs Christopher Taylor / Barbara Johnson6-1, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGraham Lemoine / Mary Fendley vs Tabitha Nankya / Gage Batterton7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2025-07-07vs Taylor/18&O/4.0/MD/RPARLost 03
L#1 DoublesMary Fendley / Graham Lemoine vs Vijaydeep Singh / Tabitha Nankya4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAlan Smith / Lauryn Brooks vs Chandler Ashworth / Tish Jowers3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCollin Wick / DeEtte Wick vs Christopher Taylor / Chloe Batterton3-6, 2-6
2025-07-06vs Taylor/18&O/4.0/MD/RPARLost 02
L#1 DoublesMary Fendley / Graham Lemoine vs Vijaydeep Singh / Tabitha Nankya1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCollin Wick / DeEtte Wick vs Chandler Ashworth / Chloe Batterton1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0 Ruston (18&O) Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Taylor/18&O/4.0/MD/RPAR411051398
2Fendley/18&O/4.0/MD/RPAR1451022149

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Katie Cracraft
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Collin Wick
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.88
DeEtte Wick
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Graham Lemoine
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Lauryn Brooks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Fendley
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

DeEtte Wick + Collin Wick134 matchesnot enough data
Mary Fendley + Graham Lemoine134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Cracraft
9W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
3.5
Collin Wick
1W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
DeEtte Wick
3W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
83%17%<1%
2.88
Graham Lemoine
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lauryn Brooks
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Fendley
4W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.