Teams

Russell-Stagg/Rogers/MRC

2025 Adult 55 & Over Spring League · 4.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-19vs Raymond/Rogers/SVCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrenda Jeter / Jennifer Scogin vs Alysia Treece / Rebecca Cantey6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDonna Russell / Gena Stagg vs Lisa Hinkebein / Cindy Velotta6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesNan Ginger / Heidi May vs Gina Alban / Amy Greer7-5, 6-3
2025-04-16vs Casey/BV/KTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesMaria Blunden / Jennifer Scogin vs Karen Casey / Barbara Johnson6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDonna Russell / Gena Stagg vs Julie DeFalco / Mary Grace Stich6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLeah Hoffmann / Colleen Daniels vs Christine Revolinski / Kitti Severns6-3, 3-3
2025-04-08vs Raymond/Rogers/SVCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesLara Henry / Sharon Gunter vs Missy Allard / Renee Clardy3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesColleen Daniels / Maria Blunden vs Kristine Warner / Cindy Velotta6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesPleshette Benford / Susan Barkley vs Deanna Cicatiello / Judith Cicatiello7-5, 6-3
2025-03-27vs Hickman/Fayetteville/SRCWon 21
W#1 DoublesGena Stagg / Heidi May vs Shirley Karr / Deann Richmond6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Coppick / Susan Barkley vs Natalie Lindsey / Odulia Sites6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesNan Ginger / Brenda Jeter vs Sherri Dillard / Kristy Maher4-6, 1-6
2025-03-20vs Casey/BV/KTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesColleen Daniels / Sharon Gunter vs Karen Casey / Barbara Johnson3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBrenda Jeter / Gena Stagg vs Jodee Gore-Miller / Catherine Young6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMaria Blunden / Leah Hoffmann vs Marsha Taylor / Cynthia Waters7-6, 6-1
2025-03-03vs Blackburn-Shearman/Farmington/FACLost 03
L#1 DoublesHeidi May / Jennifer Scogin vs Nancy Ho / Kimberly Kilgore6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDonna Russell / Lara Henry vs Tiffiny Humbert / Gayla Saegert4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesLeah Hoffmann / Colleen Daniels vs Julie Ready / Cynthia Scharlau3-6, 2-6
2025-02-22vs Hickman/Fayetteville/SRCWon 30
W#1 DoublesMaria Blunden / Karen Coppick vs Amber Gaskill / Odulia Sites6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPleshette Benford / Donna Russell vs Kristy Maher / Sherri Dillard3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSusan Barkley / Leah Hoffmann vs Teresa Killough / Carol Harris6-1, 6-1
2025-02-15vs Blackburn-Shearman/Farmington/FACLost 12
W#1 DoublesHeidi May / Sharon Gunter vs Debby Blackburn / Susan Akins7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKaren Coppick / Jennifer Scogin vs Nancy Ho / Kimberly Kilgore3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesGena Stagg / Pleshette Benford vs Julie Ready / Cynthia Scharlau2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Leah Hoffmann
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Maria Blunden
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.71
Sharon Gunter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.68
Karen Coppick
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.67
Pleshette Benford
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.64
Lara Henry
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.55
Heidi May
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.37
Brenda Jeter
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Gena Stagg
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Jennifer Scogin
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Nan Ginger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Barkley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leah Hoffmann + Maria Blunden224 matchesnot enough data
Heidi May + Pleshette Benford033 matchesnot enough data
Heidi May + Leah Hoffmann213 matchesnot enough data
Karen Coppick + Maria Blunden303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leah Hoffmann
32W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.83
Maria Blunden
24W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Sharon Gunter
20W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
Karen Coppick
11W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Pleshette Benford
14W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%88%1%
3.67
Lara Henry
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.64
Heidi May
18W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.55
3.5
Brenda Jeter
14W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
Gena Stagg
8W–3L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Scogin
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nan Ginger
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Barkley
15W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.