Teams

RTeat (WSRC)

2026 Combo Doubles 65 & Over League · 65 & Over Combo 7.5 Men - Wed PM

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · 65 & Over Combo 7.5 Men - Wed PM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RTeat (WSRC)000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Tom Traub
published
3.82
Richard Teat
published 4
3.76
Brian Cudney
published 4
3.75
Richard Gallagher
published
3.64
Kevin Seasely
published 4
3.59
Larry McCorkle
published
3.52
Chin Lin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.43
Steven Todd
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Allen Ramsey
published 3.5
3.20
Jeff Allcock
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.18
Gary Usher
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chin Lin + Jeff Allcock5164% games+14.7% vs expected
Richard Teat + Larry McCorkle224 matchesnot enough data
Richard Teat + Steven Todd314 matchesnot enough data
Gary Usher + Chin Lin224 matchesnot enough data
Tom Traub + Kevin Seasely213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tom Traub
14W–5L career · no lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Richard Teat
91W–66L career · no lines in 2026
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Brian Cudney
22W–11L career · no lines in 2026
2%95%3%
3.76
Richard Gallagher
26W–37L career · no lines in 2026
2%95%3%
3.75
4
Kevin Seasely
48W–87L career · no lines in 2026
14%85%<1%
3.64
Larry McCorkle
11W–13L career · no lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.59
3.5
Chin Lin
83W–45L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.52
Steven Todd
21W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Allen Ramsey
16W–23L career · type S · no lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
Jeff Allcock
26W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Gary Usher
27W–77L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.18

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.