Teams

EW-JTC-VanDerschelden-Victorious Secret

2025 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.07 / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2025-03-23vs LRC-Hyde/Walz-Babes With BallsWon 40
W#1 DoublesShelly Hebert / Loreal ARGYLE vs Elena Belous / Kristen Hillman6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesLori Neeley vs Denise Costanti6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesNadine Johnson Rice / Joelle Tweit vs Carmen Britt / Alexandra Holien6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLiz VanDerschelden / Debbie Donovan vs Connie Worthen / Sarah Tays3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-03-21vs JTC-Bonds/Filomeo 40-LoveSplit 22
L#1 DoublesLoreal ARGYLE / MaryAnn Baker vs Michelle Filomeo / Jaime Brucker4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLori Neeley vs Kellie Manary1-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesDebbie Dymarkowski / Nadine Johnson Rice vs Lee Anna Bonds / Betsy Whisenhunt6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesEmalee Cardwell / Laura Jones vs Liliana Cardenas / Malisa Munoz6-0, 3-6, 1-0
2025-03-16vs STAC-Stedham-Underwood OrphansWon 40
W#1 DoublesSievkheng Ly / Joelle Tweit vs Anne Marie Stedham / Christine Arceo6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesNadine Johnson Rice vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLiz VanDerschelden / Shelly Hebert vs Laurie Corwin / Kimberly Karnofski6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDebbie Dymarkowski / Rhonda Smith vs Trudi Pomeroy / Lori Denton6-0, 6-0
2025-03-01vs GTC-Gerritzen-Deuces All DaySplit 22
W#1 DoublesShelly Hebert / Marianne Mikkelson vs Maya Pawlitschek / Jillian Strayer6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesLori Neeley vs Danielle Marston6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesEmalee Cardwell / MaryAnn Baker vs Jennifer Weber / Heavenly Cole4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLiz VanDerschelden / Debbie Dymarkowski vs Shannon Gerritzen / Erika Sagle4-6, 3-6
2025-02-23vs SWW-TLTC-CrookLost 13
L#1 DoublesShelly Hebert / Marianne Mikkelson vs Sarah McCarthy / Maria Smith6-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesLori Neeley vs Julie Templin6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDebbie Donovan / Laura Jones vs Morgann Crook / Susanna Buttorff1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSievkheng Ly / Barbara van Sickle vs Julie Quesada / Stacie Nemetz7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2025-02-16vs STC-Slay Belles-WilliamsLost 01
L#1 DoublesLinda Blegen / Debbie Donovan vs Celia Evans / Amy Friedland4-6, 4-6
2025-02-09vs TLTC-Schmitz/McDougall-Alley CatsWon 31
W#1 DoublesLoreal ARGYLE / Marianne Mikkelson vs Alicia Schmitz / Anneliese Johnson6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesSievkheng Ly vs Jeanne Cubanski2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesNadine Johnson Rice / Debbie Dymarkowski vs Kristina Maritczak / Alison Ambauen4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLaura Jones / Emalee Cardwell vs Theanne Sandbo / Whitney Eng6-3, 6-3
2025-02-09vs TCSP-Alley-Oops! TamelingWon 10
W#2 DoublesDebbie Donovan / Linda Blegen vs Cinderella Gatcheco / Jolanta Grigsby4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-01-26vs KTAC-Engelhard-KitcatsWon 31
W#1 DoublesShelly Hebert / Liz VanDerschelden vs Diane Koch / Laura Seaman6-3, 7-6
W#1 SinglesLori Neeley vs Lindy Mense6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLoreal ARGYLE / Rhonda Smith vs Kay Hrdina / Leslie Engelhard6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMaryAnn Baker / Barbara van Sickle vs Elizabeth Barnes / Iris Martin6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2025-01-18vs TLTC-WilkersonWon 40
W#1 DoublesSievkheng Ly / Lori Neeley vs Amanda Wilkerson / Melinda Rowan6-4, 7-6
W#1 SinglesJoelle Tweit vs Chanda Kunz6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesShelly Hebert / Marianne Mikkelson vs Diane Kelley / Tamra Stimach6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDebbie Donovan / Emalee Cardwell vs Karen Oie / Adriana Zamora6-4, 6-0
2025-01-05vs VAC-Baumgardner-Valley RacqueteersSplit 22
L#1 DoublesLiz VanDerschelden / Debbie Dymarkowski vs Sharon Abegg / Michele Capestany2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesSievkheng Ly vs Mi Ae Kim6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLoreal ARGYLE / Joelle Tweit vs Ellen Stagnone / Hyo Han6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesEmalee Cardwell / Laura Jones vs Nancy Koeppen / Susan Mazikowski6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2025-01-05vs CP-Victorious-Dauphiny BeckerLost 01
L#3 DoublesDiane Weiser / Debbie Donovan vs Ok Clark / Linda la Cava5-7, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Loreal ARGYLE
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
3.07
Lori Neeley
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.02
Marianne Mikkelson
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.92
Nadine Johnson Rice
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.88
Joelle Tweit
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
2.86
Debbie Donovan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.85
Emalee Cardwell
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.85
Liz VanDerschelden
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.84
Sievkheng Ly
usually #1 Doubles 30%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.79
Debbie Dymarkowski
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.78
Laura Jones
usually #3 Doubles 89%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published 3
2.71
Shelly Hebert
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.71
Rhonda Smith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.63
Barbara van Sickle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.55
MaryAnn Baker
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marianne Mikkelson + Nadine Johnson Rice3251% games+11.8% vs expected
Sievkheng Ly + Lori Neeley4251% games+9.7% vs expected
Shelly Hebert + Loreal ARGYLE9561% games+9.6% vs expected
Debbie Donovan + Liz VanDerschelden11264% games+7.0% vs expected
Debbie Donovan + Laura Jones5160% games+6.3% vs expected
Marianne Mikkelson + Debbie Dymarkowski5255% games+4.6% vs expected
Joelle Tweit + Sievkheng Ly2349% games+4.3% vs expected
Joelle Tweit + Shelly Hebert1646% games+4.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Loreal ARGYLE
86W–42L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%23%77%
3.10
3.5
Lori Neeley
59W–95L career · type A · 9 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07
3
Marianne Mikkelson
49W–98L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Nadine Johnson Rice
87W–84L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.92
3.5
Joelle Tweit
37W–47L career · 8 lines in 2025
80%20%<1%
2.88
3
Debbie Donovan
99W–58L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Emalee Cardwell
63W–42L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
2.85
3
Liz VanDerschelden
91W–88L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Sievkheng Ly
28W–55L career · 10 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Debbie Dymarkowski
69W–87L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Laura Jones
57W–82L career · 9 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Shelly Hebert
108W–93L career · 6 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
Rhonda Smith
10W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Barbara van Sickle
73W–72L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.63
3
MaryAnn Baker
75W–122L career · 3 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
2.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.