Teams

Piechocki/LR/PVCC

2022 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ARKANSAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
3.87
Kati Beth Lewis
published
3.75
Martha Blodgett
published
3.53
Janna Jennings
published
3.45
Leslie Lants
published
3.42
Amanda Piechocki
published 3.5
3.41
Laura Titus
published
3.38
Kathryn McMillian
published
3.34
Honor Canon
published 3.5
3.22
Manda Wood
published
3.21
Natalie Griffin
published
3.18
Rachel Whitmore
published
Angela Hutsell
published 3
Shelly Baron
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Colleen Youngdahl + Kati Beth Lewis7165% games+6.1% vs expected
Leslie Lants + Laura Titus251655% games+0.7% vs expected
Kathryn McMillian + Amanda Piechocki2352% games−1.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Colleen Youngdahl
50W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
3.96
Kati Beth Lewis
14W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.87
Martha Blodgett
19W–10L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
Janna Jennings
16W–20L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.53
Leslie Lants
33W–22L career · no lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Amanda Piechocki
20W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.42
Laura Titus
33W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.41
Kathryn McMillian
25W–19L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Honor Canon
8W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.34
Manda Wood
10W–10L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.22
Natalie Griffin
23W–18L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
Rachel Whitmore
21W–23L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
3
Angela Hutsell
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Shelly Baron
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.