Teams

Cheval Tri To Win - M . Schmitt

2025 Hillsborough TriLevel 18 & Over · 4.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesDiane Jackson / Christina Brugger vs Leanne Brown / Jana Bridge6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKrista Missbach / Neisa Dokken vs Amanda Rockwood / Katie Johnson4-6, 2-6
2025-08-13vs River Hills - T. ManganelloWon 20
W#2 DoublesMary Schmitt / Neisa Dokken vs Grace DiBenedetto / Brigitte Paola6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCornelia Eckert / Kristina Cooper vs Melissa Sparks / Merbaliz Ferris3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 DoublesChristina Brugger / Diane Jackson vs Michele Vogeley / Rhonda Mendoza6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKrista Missbach / Heidi Milan vs Carla Velasquez / Brittney Herron6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2025-07-23vs Arbor Greene - C. PaulWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristina Brugger / Diane Jackson vs Cynthia Martinez / Lara Slatniske6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesHeidi Milan / Krista Missbach vs Karyn Bersch / Katie Johnson6-4, 6-0
2025-07-09vs Apollo Beach - K. BryanWon 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Durkin / Mary Schmitt vs Mary Flynn / Evonski Lennear6-3, 7-6
W#1 DoublesNatalie Martinez / Christina Brugger vs Michelle Bonilla / Meagan McGill2-3
W#3 DoublesCharmaine Wynter Carpenter / Cornelia Eckert vs Andrea Stuart / Melissa Collier6-2, 7-6
2025-06-25vs River Hills - T. ManganelloSplit 11
L#1 DoublesChristina Brugger / Natalie Martinez vs Shannon Deck / Kerri Fritsch4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHeidi Milan / Krista Missbach vs Brigitte Paola / Tina Warmbier6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.19
Christina Brugger
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 4.5
3.74
Neisa Dokken
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.68
Natalie Martinez
published
3.65
Diane Jackson
published 4
3.59
Patricia Frost
published
3.44
Krista Missbach
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Fatima Zinober
published 3.5
3.27
Kristina Cooper
published
3.25
Lisa Durkin
published
3.22
Heidi Milan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Mary Schmitt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.01
Allyson Goodart
published 3.5
2.88
Cornelia Eckert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Patricia McCullough
published
2.56
Anjali Singh
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christina Brugger + Neisa Dokken7166% games+8.6% vs expected
Diane Jackson + Neisa Dokken6353% games+7.2% vs expected
Lisa Durkin + Heidi Milan6158% games+4.9% vs expected
Diane Jackson + Natalie Martinez4350% games−6.0% vs expected
Mary Schmitt + Christina Brugger71542% gamesnot enough data
Mary Schmitt + Heidi Milan0930% gamesnot enough data
Krista Missbach + Heidi Milan4546% gamesnot enough data
Christina Brugger + Krista Missbach4156% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christina Brugger
145W–93L career · 11 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
4.19
3.5
Neisa Dokken
76W–33L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.74
Natalie Martinez
24W–23L career · no lines in 2025
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Diane Jackson
15W–18L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.65
Patricia Frost
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.59
3.5
Krista Missbach
115W–78L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Fatima Zinober
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
Kristina Cooper
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
Lisa Durkin
17W–13L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Heidi Milan
82W–157L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Mary Schmitt
65W–152L career · 2 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Allyson Goodart
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.01
3
Cornelia Eckert
54W–53L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Charmaine Wynter Carpenter
85W–78L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%10%
2.83
Patricia McCullough
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Anjali Singh
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
2.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.