Teams

SFV-LLW - Team Ibuprofen - Lily Wu

SFV-Adult 55 & Over · SFV Women 9.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.38 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
W#2 DoublesJennifer Berman / Karen Hankinson vs Daren Collins / Elisabeth Marks6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJulie Juliani / Tai Sisson vs Krystal Meier / Kathleen Bennett1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJulie Juliani / Karen Hankinson vs Elisabeth Marks / Tracy Muesing2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLily Reeves / Sharon Li vs Vicky Blanco / Kelly Ross1-6, 2-6
2021-06-20vs SGV-LLW - Tennis Luv - Vicky BlancoSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDiane Perryman / Karen Hankinson vs Vicky Blanco / Kelly Ross6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesTrish Halamandaris / Lily Reeves vs Daren Collins / Tracy Muesing1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLily Reeves / Trish Halamandaris vs Vicky Blanco / Daren Collins2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV Women 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Karen Hankinson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.35
Tai Sisson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Cheryl Park
published 4.5
3.97
Lily Wu
published
3.96
Trish Halamandaris
published
3.86
Diane Perryman
published 4
3.63
Lily Reeves
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.59
Sharon Li
published
Julie Juliani
published
Victoria Wright
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Hankinson + Diane Perryman134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Karen Hankinson
131W–70L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%82%18%
4.38
4.5
Tai Sisson
249W–74L career · 1 line in 2021
<1%87%13%
4.35
4.5
Cheryl Park
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Lily Wu
3W–7L career · no lines in 2021
58%42%<1%
3.97
Trish Halamandaris
1W–9L career · no lines in 2021
62%38%<1%
3.96
4
Diane Perryman
91W–104L career · no lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
3.86
Lily Reeves
41W–59L career · 3 lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
3.63
Sharon Li
13W–10L career · no lines in 2021
24%75%<1%
3.59
Julie Juliani
4W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Victoria Wright
9W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.