Teams

GEPTA-3.5-Adult/M(Melendez)(EPTC#1)

SouthernNewMexico · 2024 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-06-09Lost 02
L#1 DoublesOmar Alcala Larrea / Omar Ramirez vs Daniel Trejo / Eric Swanson1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLARRY MELENDEZ / Jose Canales vs Thomas Lore / Yevgenko Makarov3-6, 5-7
2024-06-02Lost 02
L#2 SinglesArmando Nocedal Santiago vs Sergio Castaneda4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesOmar Ramirez / Jose Canales vs Zachary Daw / Greg Daw3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-05-28vs GEPTA-3.5-Adult/M(Smith)(CCC)Won 20
W#1 DoublesOmar Alcala Larrea / Ernesto Rodriguez vs Stephane Martel / Eddie Nassar6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDaniel Montoya / Armando Nocedal Santiago vs Britton Boyd / Jorge Kareh6-2, 6-1
2024-05-05Won 20
W#2 DoublesDaniel Montoya / Armando Nocedal Santiago vs Dante Coyazo / Carlos Meza6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesSERGIO GARCIA RAMIREZ vs Omar Cervantes-Lopez6-2, 6-3
2024-04-28Lost 01
L#1 SinglesArmando Nocedal Santiago vs Jose Hernandez-Bravo3-6, 3-6
2024-04-21Lost 02
L#1 DoublesArmando Nocedal Santiago / Jose Canales vs Alejandro Abbud / Humberto Cardiel6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSERGIO GARCIA RAMIREZ / Ralph Rasura vs Francisco Orrantia / Jordan Furman4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-04-14Won 10
W#1 SinglesArmando Nocedal Santiago vs Sebastian Acosta7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2024-03-22Split 11
L#1 DoublesJose Canales / Ralph Rasura vs Stephane Martel / Eddie Nassar4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesArmando Nocedal Santiago vs Sebastian Martinez-Villalba6-2, 6-1
2024-03-17Lost 01
L#1 SinglesOmar Alcala Larrea vs Olac Fuentes0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 2024 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA-3.5-Adult/M(Mirazo)(EPCC#1)81301543380
2GEPTA-3.5-Adult/M(Cisneros)(EPTC#3)72291639350
3GEPTA-3.5-Adult/M(EStrada)(FB)54242149371
4GEPTA-3.5-Adult/M(Melendez)(EPTC#1)45242149407
5GEPTA-3.5-Adult/M(Lopez)(EPTC#2)45212459426
6GEPTA-3.5-Adult/M(Roldan)(EPCC#2)27153068461

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Alan Valdez
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 4
3.46
Carlos Zamora
usually #2 Singles 39%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
3.39
Adrian Valdez
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.15
Armando Nocedal Santiago
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Daniel Montoya
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Gabriel Soto
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Gerardo Martinez
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Jose Canales
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Juan Carlos Vazquez Talamantes
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Juan Castaneda
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published
LARRY MELENDEZ
usually #3 Doubles 32%, also #1 Doubles 32% · published
Omar Alcala Larrea
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Omar Ramirez
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published
Ralph Rasura
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
Ricardo Banuelos
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
SERGIO GARCIA RAMIREZ
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gabriel Soto + LARRY MELENDEZ5451% gamesnot enough data
Gerardo Martinez + Omar Ramirez404 matchesnot enough data
LARRY MELENDEZ + Carlos Zamora213 matchesnot enough data
Daniel Montoya + Armando Nocedal Santiago213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alan Valdez
11W–6L career · 7 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
3.5
Carlos Zamora
26W–4L career · 13 lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.46
3.5
Adrian Valdez
11W–5L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%77%22%
3.39
3.5
Armando Nocedal Santiago
13W–8L career · 7 lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.15
3
Daniel Montoya
9W–9L career · 12 lines in 2024
not enough data
Gabriel Soto
39W–42L career · 30 lines in 2024
not enough data
Gerardo Martinez
21W–12L career · 8 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jose Canales
5W–12L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Juan Carlos Vazquez Talamantes
8W–4L career · 8 lines in 2024
not enough data
Juan Castaneda
9W–10L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
LARRY MELENDEZ
34W–23L career · 18 lines in 2024
not enough data
Omar Alcala Larrea
3W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Omar Ramirez
12W–7L career · 13 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ralph Rasura
50W–68L career · 33 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ricardo Banuelos
6W–4L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
SERGIO GARCIA RAMIREZ
25W–25L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.