Teams

Cornelius - Corn Chaos

2025 Montgomery Combo Fall · Montgomery Combo Fall 6.5 Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-11-17vs Zack - ManorLost 03
L#1 DoublesHelen Chao / Jane Davenport vs Denise Plude / Vanessa Provencher2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSanam Boroumand / Jami Kempf vs Ashley Johnson / Melissa Galloway1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKerry Mustico / Jill Wiener vs Karen Dugan / Mary Ferentinos0-6, 6-7
2025-10-24vs Zack - ManorWon 21
W#1 DoublesJane Davenport / Jocelyn Lin vs Karen Dugan / Maureen Smith7-5, 4-5
L#2 DoublesGrace Wei / Megan Rappolt vs Vanessa Provencher / Denise Plude1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKerry Mustico / Sara Zalowitz vs Mary Ferentinos / Susan Grimberg7-6, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Combo Fall 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Jane Davenport
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Megan Rappolt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Leah Jones
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Chenchen Feng
published 3
2.80
Margaret Cornelius
published
2.79
Adrienne Allen
published 3
2.77
Grace Wei
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Sara Zalowitz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Barbara Braffett
published 3
2.73
Jennifer Donaghue
published
2.72
Helen Chao
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Sanam Boroumand
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Jami Kempf
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Kerry Mustico
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
Lemin Xiao
published
Jill Wiener
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jocelyn Lin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adrienne Allen + Megan Rappolt3260% gamesnot enough data
Jane Davenport + Margaret Cornelius224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jane Davenport
4W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.02
Megan Rappolt
10W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.02
Leah Jones
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Chenchen Feng
11W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.98
Margaret Cornelius
14W–20L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.80
3
Adrienne Allen
5W–12L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Grace Wei
29W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Sara Zalowitz
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Barbara Braffett
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Donaghue
7W–14L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Helen Chao
10W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%2%
2.72
Sanam Boroumand
7W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Jami Kempf
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
14%86%1%
2.65
Kerry Mustico
4W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
2.63
Lemin Xiao
16W–28L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
2.52
Jill Wiener
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jocelyn Lin
5W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.