Teams

EFSC - Leiter

2025 Brevard Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.39 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-03-10vs Rockledge - MelendezLost 02
L#1 DoublesJessica Vega Coots / Kimberly Kressler vs Gisela Alcalde / Jeannette Cintron2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBeverly Gibbs / Beth Wolfram vs Sandy Dahl / Miriam Melendez2-6, 5-7
2025-03-03vs EFSC - UrbanWon 20
W#1 DoublesJessica Vega Coots / Kimberly Kressler vs Kim Viesins / Pauline Mitchell6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesBeth Wolfram vs Lisa LeDoux6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2025-02-17vs Viera Regional Park - LauWon 21
W#1 DoublesJessica Vega Coots / Kimberly Kressler vs Judy Beckler / Karen Cornthwaite6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesBeth Wolfram / Susan Salter vs Darien Lawrence / Lynne Schettino-DeFelice4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSandra Edwards / Terra Hovan vs Susan Douglas / Tonya Okray6-7, 4-6
2025-02-10vs Suntree - PassmoreLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichele Heyn / Jessica Vega Coots vs Lee Harrington / Sandra Rowe6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBeth Wolfram / Janine Brunkala vs Nancy Charitat / Sharon Bean2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSandra Edwards / Kimberly Kressler vs Ann Passmore / Unsuk Hurst2-6, 4-6
2025-02-03vs Viera Regional Park - RuetherLost 02
L#1 DoublesMichele Heyn / Jessica Vega Coots vs Danielle Hyatt / Lori Abbott6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTerra Hovan / Sandra Edwards vs Iliana Bleau / Katharine Polvino5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2025-01-27vs Brevard/Ramsey/40&Over3.5WLost 12
W#1 DoublesJanine Brunkala / Jessica Vega Coots vs Maria Diegnan / Elia Twigg6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMichele Heyn vs Heather Boesch4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKimberly Kressler / Beverly Gibbs vs Leesa Brambach / Jennifer Jackson2-6, 2-6
2025-01-20vs Fee - BaylenWon 21
W#1 DoublesJessica Vega Coots / Kimberly Kressler vs Lynda Rippolone / Caroline Jiborn6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBeth Wolfram / Sandra Edwards vs Kimberly Dooley / Lee Baylen6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJune Leiter / Tee Wells vs Jessica Dheere / Verna Baylen3-6, 3-6
2025-01-13vs EFSC - UrbanWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichele Heyn / Jessica Vega Coots vs Sylvia Segura / Cynthia Simmons2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesBeth Wolfram vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCatherine Grainger / Terra Hovan vs Kim Viesins / Pauline Mitchell2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-01-06vs Rockledge - MelendezWon 30
W#1 DoublesJanine Brunkala / Terra Hovan vs Gisela Alcalde / Mei Kalman6-4, 7-5
W#1 SinglesBeth Wolfram vs Miriam Melendez6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKimberly Kressler / Tee Wells vs Sherry Houston / Kim Tice6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Jessica Vega Coots
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.57
Beth Wolfram
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 43% · published 3.5
3.42
Michele Heyn
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.31
Terra Hovan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.28
Tee Wells
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Catherine Grainger
published 3.5
3.18
Kimberly Kressler
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.17
Mary Failla
published
3.09
Janine Brunkala
published
3.09
Sandra Edwards
published
3.05
Bonita Madden
published 3
3.03
Beverly Gibbs
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.85
June Leiter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michele Heyn + Tee Wells5554% games−2.1% vs expected
Michele Heyn + Terra Hovan2441% gamesnot enough data
Kimberly Kressler + Terra Hovan3343% gamesnot enough data
Kimberly Kressler + Jessica Vega Coots4256% gamesnot enough data
Michele Heyn + Jessica Vega Coots123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jessica Vega Coots
91W–40L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%4%96%
3.73
3.5
Beth Wolfram
41W–14L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.57
3.5
Michele Heyn
109W–104L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Terra Hovan
108W–71L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Tee Wells
129W–96L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Catherine Grainger
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Kimberly Kressler
70W–76L career · 7 lines in 2025
9%91%1%
3.18
Mary Failla
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
Janine Brunkala
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
3.09
Sandra Edwards
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.09
3
Bonita Madden
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Beverly Gibbs
74W–44L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.03
June Leiter
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
88%12%<1%
2.85

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.