Teams

Ouellette/Nashville

2025 Combo 18 & Over - Nashville · 6.5 Women - Tuesday AM & PM

13 players · average NTRP 3.25 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-09-16vs Bailey/NashvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesLauren Weaver / Kate Tharp vs Grace Bryan / Justine Schwartz6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAlly Bateman / Lissa Jarnigan vs Alise Gregory / Morgan Williamson3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSarah Enstice / Kristin Barlowe vs Tara Wilkins / Jennifer Bonds6-2, 6-4
2025-09-02vs Burnstein/Schneider/NashvilleWon 21
L#1 DoublesKristin Dennis / Kelly Myers vs Amanda Schneider / Chanel Doree6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCristin Hambidge / Grace Hogue vs Virginia Mazzoni / Lindsey Burroughs6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLisa Yawn / Kelsey Wilmore vs Mary Margaret Behncke / Angie Simmons6-1, 6-1
2025-08-19vs Bailey/NashvilleWon 21
L#1 DoublesKristin Barlowe / Sarah Enstice vs Gillian Stewart / Laura Beth Henninger1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKate Tharp / Grace Hogue vs Gabrielle Morris / Kara Wright6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLissa Jarnigan / Ally Bateman vs Caroline Bailey / Rachel Mort6-0, 6-3
2025-08-12vs Parrish/Shaffer/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlly Bateman / Cristin Hambidge vs Jessica Shaffer / Maggie Vandever3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesGrace Hogue / Nicole Babu vs Mandy Rogers / Erica Waterbury4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesKatie Ouellette / Nicole Hogue vs Ali Triplett / Felicia Gannon3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women - Tuesday AM & PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Lisa Yawn
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.51
Kristin Dennis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Nicole Babu
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.36
Lissa Jarnigan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.35
Cristin Hambidge
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Katie Ouellette
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.20
Kate Tharp
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.14
Kristin Barlowe
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.13
Grace Hogue
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Kelsey Wilmore
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Sarah Enstice
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.88
Nicole Hogue
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Ally Bateman
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kate Tharp + Lissa Jarnigan4649% games+5.5% vs expected
Cristin Hambidge + Nicole Babu16854% games+3.5% vs expected
Lisa Yawn + Kristin Dennis2350% games−4.0% vs expected
Sarah Enstice + Grace Hogue4162% gamesnot enough data
Ally Bateman + Lissa Jarnigan314 matchesnot enough data
Lissa Jarnigan + Grace Hogue404 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Yawn + Cristin Hambidge123 matchesnot enough data
Kate Tharp + Ally Bateman123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Yawn
20W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.54
Kristin Dennis
17W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.51
Nicole Babu
37W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
Lissa Jarnigan
27W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.36
3.5
Cristin Hambidge
30W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.35
Katie Ouellette
27W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
Kate Tharp
18W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Kristin Barlowe
11W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.14
Grace Hogue
23W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.13
Kelsey Wilmore
15W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%21%79%
3.12
Sarah Enstice
28W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.09
Nicole Hogue
8W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Ally Bateman
16W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.