Teams

Martin/55/4.0/M/Forest

2026 BR Adult 55 & Over - Men · 4.0 BR (55&O) Men

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-03-29vs Ligh/55/4.0/M/BRECWon 20
W#1 DoublesJeff Williams / James Bruno vs Eddie Weeks / Long Nguyen6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMitch Rayborn / Kevin Simpson vs Mark Holliday / Randy Ligh6-2, 6-1
2026-03-22vs Ligh/55/4.0/M/BRECWon 21
L#1 DoublesGuy Forrest / Forest Reis vs Mark Holliday / Jay Thomas1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMitch Rayborn / Kevin Simpson vs Duke Minton / Jody Capello7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDavid Thompson / Mark Christopher vs Danny Lai / Michael Schilling6-3, 7-5
2026-03-15vs Ligh/55/4.0/M/BRECLost 03
L#1 DoublesMark Christopher / Jeff Martin vs Mark Holliday / Jay Thomas2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGuy Forrest / Michael Phillips vs Raul Molieri / Danny Lai6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesClay Berthelot / Keith Andry vs Jody Capello / Long Nguyen4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-03-08vs Ligh/55/4.0/M/BRECWon 21
W#1 DoublesJeff Williams / Derek Stafford vs Mark Holliday / Duke Minton6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJeff Martin / David Thompson vs Eddie Weeks / Danny Lai6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDaniel Adler / Keith Andry vs Randy Ligh / Jody Capello7-5, 6-0
2026-03-01vs Ligh/55/4.0/M/BRECWon 30
W#1 DoublesJames Bruno / Jeff Martin vs Mark Holliday / Jay Thomas4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDerek Stafford / Clay Berthelot vs Donald Shipley / Raul Molieri6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMartin Padial / Forest Reis vs Danny Lai / Michael Schilling6-7, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0 BR (55&O) Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Martin/55/4.0/M/Forest4110512119
2Ligh/55/4.0/M/BREC1451023168

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Jeff Williams
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.90
Mitch Rayborn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.83
Jeff Martin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.79
Derek Stafford
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Daniel Adler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Forest Reis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
Guy Forrest
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.71
Clay Berthelot
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
James Bruno
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Kevin Simpson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
Mark Christopher
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Keith Andry
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Phillips
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Phillips + Guy Forrest224 matchesnot enough data
Jeff Martin + James Bruno314 matchesnot enough data
Kevin Simpson + Clay Berthelot303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeff Williams
36W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.95
Mitch Rayborn
28W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.90
Jeff Martin
86W–45L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Derek Stafford
28W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Daniel Adler
10W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
4
Forest Reis
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Guy Forrest
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Clay Berthelot
9W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.71
4
James Bruno
22W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.69
Kevin Simpson
19W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.68
Mark Christopher
20W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
Keith Andry
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Phillips
10W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.