Teams

WSC-Low

2025 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Men

21 players · average NTRP 4.09 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-06-01vs BETC-HoangWon 41
L#1 DoublesPeter Griff / Chris Higashi vs Bradley Hoefel / Eric Sanchez7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesErik Tseng vs Clarke Straus7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTue Khuc / Jeffrey Nguyen vs Daniel Fan / NIKHIL PARSI6-0, 6-4
W#2 SinglesPeilun Shan vs Dat Nguyen6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJohn Vu / Justin Low vs Aaron Haffner / Brian Porter6-4, 6-2
L#1 DoublesVu Dinh / Jefferson Lai vs Clay Dudley / Jeremy Janson2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesPeilun Shan vs Justin Epstein7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesAndrew Bagherpour / Jay Squire vs Kevin Pham / James Manzano6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesSamuel Yuen vs Metarya Ruparel6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesI-Shiun Kuo / Alex Hoang vs Andrew Dickson / William Chan3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-05-17vs AYTC-Ballboy Tennis Squad-ChanWon 41
W#1 DoublesChris Higashi / Peter Griff vs Ryan Chan / Lam Nguyen6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJason Kim vs Andre Levi6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesErik Tseng / Dylan Miyasaki vs Nicholas Verghese / Matthew Cao7-5, 6-3
L#2 SinglesAndrew Bagherpour vs Brandon Nakata6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTue Khuc / Matthew Ip vs Nelson Asaba / Steve Fong3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-05-11vs WSC-WuWon 50
W#1 DoublesChris Higashi / Peter Griff vs David Lee / Linsen Wu6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJason Kim vs Christopher Vo6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAlex Hoang / Justin Low vs David Tran / Harsha Gotur6-3, 7-5
W#2 SinglesSamuel Yuen vs Evan Liu6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJeffrey Nguyen / Daniel Nguyen vs Garry Murayama / Minh Chau6-4, 6-2
2025-05-03vs MI-ParcelWon 40
W#1 DoublesChris Higashi / Peter Griff vs PETER GOODMAN / JON COOMBES6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJason Kim vs Grant Pomering6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesErik Tseng / Dylan Miyasaki vs Jay Lee / Aaron Thomas6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTue Khuc / Jay Squire vs ERIC MORSE / Ivan Ribeiro6-3, 6-0
2025-04-27vs EDG-LohWon 41
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Nguyen / Daniel Nguyen vs Sam Miller / Andrew Royes6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJason Kim vs Eric Loh6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMatthew Ip / Justin Low vs Eric Bai / Ravi Ramkumar6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesPeilun Shan vs Christopher Gipson6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesOLIVER LEI / I-Shiun Kuo vs Jason Cook / Mark Brown6-0, 6-0
2025-04-12vs CP-Hitmakers-OroszlanWon 50
W#1 DoublesOLIVER LEI / Dylan Miyasaki vs Lyle Li / Steve Oroszlan6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesSamuel Yuen vs VINAY Kumar3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesErik Tseng / Peilun Shan vs Tod Wescott / Bhanu Purohit6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJason Kim vs Skanda Iyer6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJohn Vu / Jay Squire vs Marc Stolte / Kyle Rutherford6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2025-04-05vs BTA-Serve Aces-ChinnWon 50
W#1 DoublesChris Higashi / Peter Griff vs William Hubbard / Naveen Makkar6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJason Kim vs Ken Benoit6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTue Khuc / OLIVER LEI vs Charles Borberg / Adam Kay6-3, 7-6
W#2 SinglesAndrew Bagherpour vs ATUL ALATKAR6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMatthew Ip / Jeffrey Nguyen vs Glenn Chinn / Jordan Bluehdorn6-2, 6-4
2025-03-29vs FC-HsuWon 32
W#1 DoublesChris Higashi / Peter Griff vs Aleksey Ovchinnikov / YUTARO SAKAI2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesOLIVER LEI vs Arindam Majumder6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTue Khuc / Jefferson Lai vs Sam Au / Thai Tran6-3, 7-6
L#2 SinglesPeilun Shan vs Bofan Hsu3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesAlex Hoang / Dylan Miyasaki vs Craig Collins / Nicholas Ngo7-5, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.99 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.54
Branden Muraki
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.41
Jason Kim
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
4.23
OLIVER LEI
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 4.5
4.11
Samuel Yuen
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
4.04
Tue Khuc
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.04
Andrew Bagherpour
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.95
Erik Tseng
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.91
Alex Hoang
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.91
Justin Low
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.89
Chris Higashi
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.89
Jeffrey Nguyen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.89
Peilun Shan
usually #2 Singles 30%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.83
Matthew Ip
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.82
I-Shiun Kuo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.76
Jay Squire
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Daniel Nguyen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
Peter Griff
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.57
Dylan Miyasaki
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
Jefferson Lai
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
John Vu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Vu Dinh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chris Higashi + Alex Hoang8265% games+11.1% vs expected
John Vu + Tue Khuc11361% games+9.8% vs expected
Jeffrey Nguyen + Daniel Nguyen10654% games+6.3% vs expected
Chris Higashi + Peter Griff9454% games+3.7% vs expected
Jeffrey Nguyen + Tue Khuc4349% games+3.3% vs expected
Jeffrey Nguyen + Matthew Ip9154% games−2.0% vs expected
Matthew Ip + Justin Low5452% games−2.8% vs expected
I-Shiun Kuo + Alex Hoang4157% games−4.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Branden Muraki
87W–71L career · 6 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.54
Jason Kim
43W–14L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
4.41
4.5
OLIVER LEI
62W–17L career · 6 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
4.23
4
Samuel Yuen
24W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
4.11
4.5
Tue Khuc
100W–54L career · 10 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
4.04
4
Andrew Bagherpour
21W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
4.04
4
Erik Tseng
54W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.95
4
Alex Hoang
61W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.91
4
Justin Low
123W–90L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.91
4
Chris Higashi
128W–76L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.89
4
Jeffrey Nguyen
47W–34L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.89
4
Peilun Shan
42W–17L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.89
4
Matthew Ip
89W–59L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
I-Shiun Kuo
37W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
3.5
Jay Squire
15W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.76
4
Daniel Nguyen
37W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Peter Griff
53W–43L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Dylan Miyasaki
32W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
Jefferson Lai
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
John Vu
19W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Vu Dinh
25W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.