Teams

Buckhorn Sweetspots - C. Deming

2023 Hillsborough Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over Day- Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-22vs HCC Smoke Show - E. FlitmanWon 10
W#2 DoublesCarol Guido / Giselle Miller vs Emelia Flitman / Chet Gowda6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSara Newsom / Melissa Wolczak vs Julie Sayer / Sheila Calistri0-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesGinger Anzalone / Carol Guido vs Christine Cruz / Ellie Dahl6-3, 6-2
2023-05-01vs Yachty By Nature - L. DavittLost 01
L#3 DoublesSara Newsom / Melissa Wolczak vs Shannon Roark / Karyn Bersch5-7, 4-6
2023-04-28vs Buckhorn Matchmakers - N. EvansLost 01
L#1 DoublesCarol Guido / Monica Eiermann vs Nicole Evans / Kelly Mamott6-7, 1-6
2023-04-24vs Palma Ceia Penn Pirates - N. GomezSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJesse Glassford / Carol Guido vs Sibyl Curtis / Jennifer Sawyer6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesBarbara Kouimanis / Sara Newsom vs Melissa Henderson / Rachel Phillips1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCarol Guido / Giselle Miller vs Dianna Lott / Susan Rind6-1, 6-1
2023-04-03vs Hills/T. Hartigan/40&Over3.0WSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJesse Glassford / Carol Guido vs Tobey Hartigan / Kathy Skonieczny7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSara Newsom / Melissa Wolczak vs Lisa Dreisbach / Heather Barrow1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over Day- Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Jesse Glassford
published
3.16
Carol Guido
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.10
Ginger Anzalone
published
3.02
Melissa Collier
published
2.97
Carrie Deming
published 3.5
2.95
Giselle Miller
published
2.88
Melissa Wolczak
published
2.80
Susan MOSHER
published
2.73
Sara Newsom
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.52
Monica Eiermann
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ginger Anzalone + Jesse Glassford123 matchesnot enough data
Carol Guido + Sara Newsom123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jesse Glassford
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Carol Guido
232W–215L career · 7 lines in 2023
13%87%1%
3.16
Ginger Anzalone
4W–11L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.10
Melissa Collier
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%45%55%
3.02
3.5
Carrie Deming
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
2.97
Giselle Miller
1W–9L career · no lines in 2023
63%37%<1%
2.95
Melissa Wolczak
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
2.88
Susan MOSHER
16W–18L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
2.80
3
Sara Newsom
83W–79L career · 8 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Barbara Kouimanis
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
2.52
Monica Eiermann
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.