Teams

JShelley (WSRC)

2024 Adult Other 40 & Over · 40 & Over Adult 2.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-03vs BMalley/JKuperman (Longview)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesSue Selleck / Maryann Whalen vs Jessica Kuperman / Jillian Oleary3-6, 1-6
2024-04-26Won 10
W#2 DoublesSue Selleck / Jen Shelley vs Alexandra Rozema / Debra Vickers6-1, 6-2
2024-04-19vs JLang (Piper Glen)Won 10
W#2 DoublesLisa OBryan / Jen Shelley vs Starr Stroud / Donna Pollack6-3, 6-0
2024-03-29vs ARozema (Weddington Chase)Won 10
W#1 DoublesKristyn Atkins / Jen Shelley vs Emily Reedy / Lutfiye Ugurlu6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2024-03-15vs BMalley/JKuperman (Longview)Won 10
W#2 DoublesJen Shelley / Randi Trojan vs Brooke Malley / Alisa Hood6-1, 6-3
2024-03-11vs JLang (Piper Glen)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesSue Selleck / Kristyn Atkins vs Starr Stroud / Jennifer Lang3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCarolyn Iles / Maryann Whalen vs Brittany Williams / Kristina Nichols1-6, 0-6
2024-03-08Won 10
W#2 DoublesSue Selleck / Jen Shelley vs Julie Hertz / Jamie Welch4-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Kristyn Atkins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.90
Randi Trojan
published
2.88
Jen Shelley
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.60
Lisa OBryan
published
2.59
Lisa Mccorkle
published
2.57
Lori Holman
published
2.23
Nancy Pratt
published
2.15
Maryann Whalen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Nara Gregg
published
Sue Selleck
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jen Shelley + Kristyn Atkins303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Kristyn Atkins
63W–33L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%33%67%
3.06
Randi Trojan
19W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Jen Shelley
45W–24L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
2.88
Lisa OBryan
6W–9L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
2.60
Lisa Mccorkle
4W–11L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
2.59
Lori Holman
12W–10L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
2.57
Nancy Pratt
8W–20L career · no lines in 2024
98%2%<1%
2.23
3
Maryann Whalen
25W–113L career · 2 lines in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
2.15
Nara Gregg
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sue Selleck
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.