Teams

Seminole Lake Hutton

2023 Pinellas Combo 50 & Over Fall · 7.5 M Saturday

10 players · average NTRP 3.88 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-11-18vs SPTC CrushersWon 20
W#1 DoublesMauricio Caccia / Mark Nasworthy vs Kevin Burnett / Curt Ulliman6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJonathan Mellen / Carlos Rodriguez vs Wayne Lemmerbrock / WAYNE SMITH6-0, 6-2
2023-11-11vs RCSP FantauzzoWon 10
W#1 DoublesMauricio Caccia / Mark Nasworthy vs David Kenny / Kevin Fantauzzo6-3, 6-2
2023-11-04vs Pinellas/Hollingsworth/50&Over7.5MLost 02
L#2 DoublesDavid Palmer / Mark Nasworthy vs Christopher Hollingsworth / Gorban Aliak6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJonathan Mellen / Carlos Rodriguez vs Erik Breitenbach / Steven Rattner2-6, 1-6
2023-10-28vs SPTC CrushersWon 10
W#1 DoublesJonathan Mellen / Carlos Rodriguez vs George Jacome / Paul Willett6-1, 6-3
2023-10-22vs SPTC CrushersWon 10
W#1 DoublesJack Davis / Mark Nasworthy vs George Jacome / Paul Willett6-3, 6-3
2023-10-14vs Pinellas/Hollingsworth/50&Over7.5MLost 01
L#2 DoublesMauricio Caccia / Mark Nasworthy vs Christopher Hollingsworth / Gorban Aliak6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2023-09-30vs RCSP FantauzzoWon 10
W#3 DoublesMauricio Caccia / Mark Nasworthy vs David Kenny / Kevin Hennessy7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 M Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
David Palmer
published 4
Chris Eversole
published 4
3.74
John Hockin
published
3.43
Gary Hutton
published 4
3.41
Ken Chin
published
3.33
Peter Martino
published
3.30
Sean Friday
published
3.26
Mark Nasworthy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Jonathan Mellen
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
Shaji Joseph
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Hockin + Gary Hutton123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Palmer
16W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Chris Eversole
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
John Hockin
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Gary Hutton
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
69%31%<1%
3.43
Ken Chin
21W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.41
Peter Martino
12W–15L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.33
Sean Friday
13W–13L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.30
3.5
Mark Nasworthy
114W–79L career · 6 lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.26
Jonathan Mellen
63W–62L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
Shaji Joseph
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.