Teams

Cypress Lake Courtney

2021 LeeCharlotte Adult 18 & Over Spring Weeknight · 3.5 W Tuesday EVE

13 players · average NTRP 3.40 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-06-08vs CCYC McNeelyLost 01
L#3 DoublesApril Dennis / Linda King vs Michelle Cronin / Julia Owens4-6, 4-6
2021-05-18vs LeeChar - FMRC/VerdiLost 01
L#2 SinglesLinda King vs Julianne Cooper1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2021-05-11vs Paseo ZimmerLost 01
L#1 DoublesJulia Donaldson / Linda King vs Laura Campbell / Linda Ripley4-6, 5-7
2021-05-04vs CCYC McNeelyLost 01
L#3 DoublesLinda King / Marcia Disharoon vs Michelle Cronin / Mary Alice Spencer3-6, 4-6
2021-04-27vs Vivante KaplanLost 01
L#2 DoublesJanet Courtney / Linda King vs Karenanne Fitzsimmons / Patrice Sanasac5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2021-04-26Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJulia Donaldson / Linda King vs Kimberly Alonzi / Sheila Patterson2-6, 3-6
2021-04-06vs Unlimited CottonWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulia Donaldson / Linda King vs Rhonda Allen / Leesa Cotton6-7, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 W Tuesday EVE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Marilyn Kole
published
3.21
Diana Metzger
published 3.5
3.14
Carrie Payne
published 3.5
3.10
Elizabeth Gaines
published 3.5
3.08
Terri Destoppelaire
published
3.05
Jennifer Birdsong
published
3.04
Christine Wiles
published 3.5
3.03
Marcia Disharoon
published
3.00
Kim Deck
published
2.96
Elaine Kearney
published 3
2.93
Linda King
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Julia Donaldson
published
Patricia Highley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elaine Kearney + Kim Deck303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marilyn Kole
8W–6L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Diana Metzger
3W–2L career · no lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Carrie Payne
3W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Elizabeth Gaines
7W–7L career · no lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
3.10
Terri Destoppelaire
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
3.08
Jennifer Birdsong
2W–5L career · no lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
3.05
3.5
Christine Wiles
2W–5L career · no lines in 2021
37%63%<1%
3.04
Marcia Disharoon
4W–8L career · no lines in 2021
41%59%<1%
3.03
Kim Deck
6W–5L career · no lines in 2021
50%50%<1%
3.00
3
Elaine Kearney
7W–14L career · no lines in 2021
<1%61%39%
2.96
Linda King
69W–91L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%71%28%
2.93
Julia Donaldson
24W–18L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Patricia Highley
3W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.