Teams

DTP GREEN

2024 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 2.88 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-07-15vs SKY BLUELost 04
L#1 DoublesPeggy Moody / Anne Beletic vs Ginger Merry / Angie Sanders2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesSoudabeh Kargar vs Emily Brown3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesValerie Kilzer / Shelly Wesner vs Mychael Jones / Lauryn Meyer2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesKaren Schuster / Gayle Strong vs Jennifer Clanahan / Tae Rice-Schlesinger6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2024-07-08vs CACM GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesKaren Schuster / Xiaoyan Wang vs AUSRA MOLLERUD / Jennifer Digan6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesJane Harmon vs Kimberly Schnetzer1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMaureen Clarke / Shelly Wesner vs Catherine Kraft / Sarah Payne6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPeggy Moody / Valerie Kilzer vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-07-01vs EM BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesSoudabeh Kargar / Shelly Wesner vs Lisa Allen / Janet Willson3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJane Harmon vs Tammy Terhaar6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesXiaoyan Wang / Anne Beletic vs Ellen Leher / Molly Walsh6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesPeggy Moody / Gayle Strong vs Susan Engeman / Jen Fornstrom6-3, 7-6
2024-06-24vs ATC REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesAnne Beletic / Peggy Moody vs Darcee Mauger / Whitney Groth1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesXiaoyan Wang vs Barbara Fraser7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSoudabeh Kargar / Karen Schuster vs Molly DiCarlo / Jody Power3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesMaureen Clarke / Jane Harmon vs Allison Dodge / Kim Bolt6-0, 6-4
2024-06-17vs WP-G REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesXiaoyan Wang / Anne Beletic vs Sarah Warsh / Tara Wiebe6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJane Harmon vs Marissa Ogden2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMaureen Clarke / Shelly Wesner vs Michelle Telfer / Theresa Wheeler6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesGayle Strong / Valerie Kilzer vs Susan Anderson / Alexia Eslan3-6, 6-7
2024-06-10vs VC BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesAnne Beletic / Xiaoyan Wang vs Merrell Aspin / Stephanie McCoy6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesSoudabeh Kargar vs Megan Kane6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesShelly Wesner / Maureen Clarke vs Kate Patton / Annie Cordova6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesPeggy Moody / Karen Schuster vs Stephanie Chichester / Maya Pingle Trinen6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2024-06-03vs CHCC REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesAnne Beletic / Peggy Moody vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesSoudabeh Kargar vs Nanette Baumbusch6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMaureen Clarke / Valerie Kilzer vs Kirstin Simmons / Angela Lercara2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKaren Schuster / Gayle Strong vs Lauren Ross / Holly Garnsey7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Xiaoyan Wang
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.88
Anne Beletic
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.85
Soudabeh Kargar
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.78
Gayle Strong
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Karen Schuster
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.65
Jane Harmon
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.59
Maureen Clarke
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.49
Valerie Kilzer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.43
Peggy Moody
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Shelly Wesner
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Valerie Kilzer + Gayle Strong3847% games+2.3% vs expected
Anne Beletic + Peggy Moody81045% games−0.9% vs expected
Maureen Clarke + Shelly Wesner4155% gamesnot enough data
Jane Harmon + Valerie Kilzer134 matchesnot enough data
Anne Beletic + Shelly Wesner213 matchesnot enough data
Anne Beletic + Xiaoyan Wang303 matchesnot enough data
Peggy Moody + Karen Schuster033 matchesnot enough data
Gayle Strong + Karen Schuster123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Xiaoyan Wang
50W–49L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.33
3
Anne Beletic
69W–78L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Soudabeh Kargar
18W–31L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Gayle Strong
9W–16L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%94%5%
2.78
Karen Schuster
19W–24L career · 5 lines in 2024
9%91%1%
2.68
Jane Harmon
25W–54L career · 4 lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
2.65
Maureen Clarke
28W–56L career · 5 lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
2.59
2.5
Valerie Kilzer
24W–73L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%53%47%
2.49
Peggy Moody
25W–44L career · 4 lines in 2024
69%31%<1%
2.43
Shelly Wesner
23W–26L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.